Re: [Paddlewise] Re: Sospenders PFD

From: Peter Treby <ptreby_at_ozemail.com.au>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:25:38 +1000
Rob wrote:
"What was it that made the inflatable desirable over a foam pfd in the 
surf thrashing? I don't like my foam one as it makes it harder to duck 
under a wave, what was your pal's reasoning?"
My friend came out of his boat, was swept out in a rip, and recycled. He 
had a struggle swimming, and tired. I think the reasoning is that while 
uninflated, it's easier to swim with an inflatable than a foam pfd. When 
very tired, and battered by waves, the inflatable can be inflated, and 
you use less energy keeping your head above water.
One downside with inflatables is less body armour when near rocks. The 
advantage of greater comfort in normal forward paddling wins over that 
for me.
Here is the letter from Baltic to airlines: 
http://www.balticlifejackets.com/_pdf/IATA_Dangerous_goods.pdf
Here are the IATA regs in a table for passengers: 
http://www.iata.org/NR/ContentConnector/CS2000/SiteInterface/sites/whatwedo/dangerousgoods/file/Table2.3.AEnglish2005.pdf
(see the top of the second page). It appears inflatables are OK on 
aircraft, subject to the approval of the individual airline.
The last item in the table sets out the position with lighters.
Cheers, PT
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:25:53 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:20 PDT