I agree with you Nick, and as far as I am concerned to each his own. And they can smoke them if they have them. I just don't particularly care for the looks of the Evolution. It gives in to the whole "theme park America" thing a little to much for my taste. And if I want to see gondolas I am not going to Vegas either. Not that I don't care for the boat tail roadster look. I just as soon have it on a boat tail roadster and not a kayak that tries to look like a boat tail roadster. I am pure-bred-certifiable-Walmart-America-PWT, but that kayak is just a bit to tacky for me. I find your rendition of emulating a classic look far more tasteful. And I don't care for Velveta cheese either. :-) Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Schade" <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com> Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Fwd: Re: Evolution Kayaks > Since I have yet to find a definition of kayak that really works, you > are welcome to try to come up with a definition which excludes the > Evolution. But, that is just semantics and really not all that > important. Attempts to protect the purity of traditions lead to > foolish distinctions and petty discrimination. It paddles like a > kayak, the guy that made it wants to call it a kayak, so why not. You > are under no compulsion to like his idea, but to dismiss it as not a > kayak won't prove much. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sat May 07 2005 - 16:45:35 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:20 PDT