> Having paddled > lots of different boats with different hull shapes I've noticed a different > "feel" in the initial stability in different. Boats with very flat hull > feel very resistant to tipping. Boats with a shallow V have a gentle > rocking feel. Boats with a deeper V start to feel "twitchy", Rounded hull > boats feel "slippery" (sort of like sitting on a basketball). That's not > very scientific but that's just how different shaped hulls *feel* to me. I think that you are correct in your impression. But this is not "primary" stability as defined by Schade (basically the definition that I would accept) It is my contention that kayaks are VERY different from normal craft because the user shifts his/her weight constantly and this represents a substantial part of the weight of the craft. Stability curves are based on the concept of the paddler sitting rigidly in the boat as it heels which does not happen in real life. Imagine this "thought" experiment. Sit in some narrow 18" kayak. Extending out is a board 6" wide and 1" thick and it extends out 4 feet in each direction. It is fiberglassed to the bottom of the kayak. That kayak will feel "rock stable" as you sit in calm water. You would have little trouble taking out your camera and taking pictures. Its "primary stability" as measured on a classic stability curve is little different than the the craft that has no such board fiberglassed to the bottom. But it feels ENTIRELY different. The dynamic resistance to tipping created by the resistance of the board moving through the water gives the kayaker ample time to adjust his/her weight as the boat starts to tip one direction or another. That adjustment is practically subconscious. You could probably stand in that boat. For that matter, fiberglass a 4 foot dagger board to extend down from the middle of the hull. Make it out of a slightly buoyant material like wood and it will reduce the primary stability as measured on a stability curve. But it will feel very steady at 0 degrees of heel. I have paddled square logs that are about 16" wide and I can stay upright on them which I cannot do in a 18" kayak. My contention is that the square cross-section kayak feels initially more stable than the round kayak because there is much more dynamic resistance to the boat rotating around its long axis. It is NOT because of its stability curve which at 0-2 degrees might be identical to a boat with a rounded hull. It is like a built in paddle brace. Rock a flat bottom boat back and forth. You will kick up a lot of waves because of the resistance to rotation of those flat surfaces against the water. The rounded hull will rock back and forth with little wave action created. In the world of heavy shipping this is not much of an issue because the cargo weight cannot be shifted quickly and an unstable boat will slowly turn turtle whether it is square bottomed or rounded. That said, on passenger ships they will sometimes deploy stabilizers that extends out and resist the rolling back and forth around the long axis of the boat to increase the comfort of the passengers. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu May 12 2005 - 22:22:28 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:20 PDT