PaddleWise by thread

From: PeterO <rebyl_kayak_at_iprimus.com.au>
subject: [Paddlewise] Stability & comfort - was Evolution Kayaks
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 23:15:45 +1000
G'Day Dave, John and Paddlewise,

As a follow on, thought I'ld test my assumed knowledge in case its wrong.
Here's an approximation, not to scale, of a chined boat cross section with
letters at the corners for reference.


               Boat X section
     A                                 E
      #                               #
       #                             #
        B                           D
              #               #
  ....................C......................X

If the section CD is aligned with the wave surface, is it the design aim,
for a chined boat that this is nearly the point of initial (primary)
stability. Would the point of secondary stability be when section CDE is
roughly aligned with the wave surface. Clearly this is an over
simplification depending on the centre of gravity of the boat and its load,
but the presence of such well defined planes in this style of boat suggests
that its not a bad approximation.

If the assumptions are correct then wouldn't chined boats have to be edged
beyond their point of initial (primary) stability to remain vertical in a
choppy sea where the wave face is at a greater angle than XCD?

All the best, PeterO
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Stability & comfort - was Evolution Kayaks
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:06:53 -0400
Peter,
  Primary stability has almost nothing to do with the cross sectional  
shape of a boat. Chines, no chines, makes no difference. It is the  
shape of the water plane and the height of the center of gravity that  
will determine initial stability.
  Secondary stability starts to have some relation to hull shape, but  
what matters as much as anything is the volume of the boat above the  
level waterline which begins to get submerged as you lean or tip the  
boat. For more discussion on the subject I have an article on my  
website: http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/Design/StabilityArticle.html
Nick

On May 10, 2005, at 9:15 AM, PeterO wrote:

> G'Day Dave, John and Paddlewise,
>
> As a follow on, thought I'ld test my assumed knowledge in case its  
> wrong.
> Here's an approximation, not to scale, of a chined boat cross  
> section with
> letters at the corners for reference.
>
>
>                Boat X section
>      A                                 E
>       #                               #
>        #                             #
>         B                           D
>               #               #
>   ....................C......................X
>
> If the section CD is aligned with the wave surface, is it the  
> design aim,
> for a chined boat that this is nearly the point of initial (primary)
> stability. Would the point of secondary stability be when section  
> CDE is
> roughly aligned with the wave surface. Clearly this is an over
> simplification depending on the centre of gravity of the boat and  
> its load,
> but the presence of such well defined planes in this style of boat  
> suggests
> that its not a bad approximation.
>
> If the assumptions are correct then wouldn't chined boats have to  
> be edged
> beyond their point of initial (primary) stability to remain  
> vertical in a
> choppy sea where the wave face is at a greater angle than XCD?
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: PeterO <rebyl_kayak_at_iprimus.com.au>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Stability & comfort - was Evolution Kayaks
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:08:26 +1000
Nick wrote: -
>For more discussion on the subject I have an
>article on my website:
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/Design/StabilityArticle.html

Matt wrote: -
>I like a progressive secondary stability that
>doesn't peak until a large angle of lean combined
>with a low initial stability. Effortless to lean
>at first but much more secure feeling when leaned
>than a kayak with high initial stability (or one
>with low initial and low secondary stability).

G'Day Dave, John, Nick, Matt, Robert et al,

Your explanations were appreciated. And Nick that web page of yours is an
excellent, clear description of stability curves, thank you! I strongly
suspect that in the wooden chined boat I am confusing the feel of initial
stability with the feel of secondary stability.

PS Three Days Later

I started to write this email on Friday and since then have been surfing in
the wooden chined boat and can confirm that the effect I was experiencing
was one of high initial stability. Also the feeling of conscious effort
required to keep the boat vertical disappeared after a couple of days so I
guess it was just a question of getting used to the boat.

Was it important? Well not as much as lack of volume in the bow and its
tendency to submerge, as I can attest after a number of spectacular endo's,
some of which I survived. Only time I've ever had a crowd on the shore
cheering and it was all by accident!

Anyway the subsequent discussion on stability is keeping me off the streets
and I'm particularly interested in trying to understand Robert Livingstone's
point on the nebulous nature of secondary stability. Its going to take a
while to think through all the correspondence though.

But I really appreciate your debate,

All the best, PeterO
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:41 PDT