Very well put Steve. >In fact, being a recently certified ACA instructor and participating in both >BCU/ACA I have been well informed that it doesn't matter WHO the leader is. >If I am along for a formal or informal paddle and have "more" experience >than the "leader" and conditions of the group paddle became risky I can >still be targeted for Liability. I recently completed the BCU Canoe/kayak Safety Course. At the end of the training we were advised that if we paddled with a group and something bad happened we might be found liable. If a case was brought, the plaintiff's lawyer could contact a BCU coach to present evidence. The question to the BCU expert would be what should the guy with the BCU canoe/safety training have done? If it could be shown I failed to do those things I could be liable. It's good to see the message is consistent. The finial advice from my instructors was only paddle with competent paddlers of at least your ability or greater. Little did I know that those words would be driven home in a very short while. After that course I lead a group of paddlers on a short day trip. Conditions where deteriorating and I informed the group that we would be cutting things short to ensure an easy return. I had the very paddler you described. One who presented with a multitude of safety and bail out options turned down each of them and subsequently threatened the safety of all the others. It was clearly a case of ego vs. prudence. Sometimes the Ego is so big that it prevents people from learning or developing judgement skills - wisdom. After getting everyone safely back I informed the group that I did not have the leadership ability to lead such a group in the conditions we'd just come through and that I would not do so again. It was the most polite way of saying I never want to paddle with you again. The conditions we'd just come through were not difficult by my standards and had I been with my regular group we would have had a blast. But all the joy was sucked out of the day because of the constant attention that had to be paid to this one paddler. When I hear people say, "I'd lead but I'm afraid of being sued," they've just lost a follower. As you said leaders should be thinking about the tasks at hand, about due care and not about some possible law suit. The other side of this coin is that clubs should be training better followers. I am no longer a member of the local club because I feel it does not foster or encourage good safety habits. We talked a good line but, IMO, never followed up. Mostly because it's hard to enforce standards of behaviour. The consequence of this is that indifferent paddlers stick around clubs while advanced paddlers drift away. I think this is what weakens what should be good healthy clubs. Yet if you look at membership numbers the local club is a screaming success. It all depends on how you measure success. Which brings me back to my original question show me the numbers. How many clubs have been successfully sued, what were the circumstances, (did they deserve to be sued) and what was the judgement/fine/penalty? If some one has access to a legal data base I'd love to hear from you. Gordin Warner Victoria BC *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Jul 08 2005 - 16:28:44 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:21 PDT