On Tuesday 17 October 2006 03:22, Chuck wrote: (snip) > But about Kids! Two states still do not require children to wear pfds. > Twice in the past two years fathers have gone fishing with a son > that has fallen overboard. In both cases, the fathers jumped in to > save their sons and in both cases father and son went to the > bottom. Tell me that it is ok for fathers to take their sons to the > bottom with them because we must preserve our god given freedom > of choice no matter who pays the price! Better arguement for PFDs is hard to find: Your loved ones have a bigger chance to retrieve your body, if you should die while paddling! And in the situation above, unless the water was extremely cold and the dads were drunk, the chances for a happy ending increases drastically if you're properly equipped! I've spent quite some time reading articles written by paddlers that end up in lifethreatening situations, on the web, plus Matt's book, and again and again the situation gets much worse due to the lack of a PFD - some do discard them when they know they are very good swimmers, but when you've been in the water a long time your brain doesn't work very well, so you can easily make the wrong descision. So if your law is always use a PFD, it is less likely that you'll take it off, when you shouldn't! Tord *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Oct 17 2006 - 12:10:03 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:22 PDT