On 11/17/06, Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com> wrote: > > > It should be mentioned that an unwritten tenet of the FCC's rules is that > any radio device used in a true emergency can be used in any way, without > penalty. I'd be amazed if there is a single piece of US case law in which > prosecution occurred under these circumstances. Let me second this. I have, in fact, participated in a radio rescue at sea using frequencies which were unauthorized (but available on the vessel's marine SSB transceiver). I subsequently received a "notice of violation" from the FCC and responded by stating that the communications were undertaken during an emergency at sea (which the transcripts of the transmissions - interecepted - clearly showed) and that no other frequency or radio channel were available at that time to successfully pass the necessary information. Nothing more was said. This was, mind you, 20 years ago but I've heard nothing to contradict this in either professional mariner circles or amateur circles in the USA to contradict it. Craig Jungers Royal City, WA *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Nov 17 2006 - 09:08:11 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:22 PDT