Image stabilization seems to imply either the lens or the sensor moves to eliminate shaking, it sounds like this camera uses digital processing to eliminate the appearance of shaking. i.e. the sensor gets an image which includes shake, but it is reduced by post- processing. On Feb 22, 2007, at 4:32 PM, Michael Daly wrote: > PeterO wrote: > >> Noticed the camera has shake reduction but not image >> stabilisation. Can >> anyone explain the difference and compare the performance of each? > > I assume they are the same thing and that the marketeers assume > people won't understand "image stabilization" as well as "shake > reduction" > Nick Schade Guillemot Kayaks 824 Thompson St Glastonbury, CT 06033 USA Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847 http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/ *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Feb 22 2007 - 14:51:37 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:23 PDT