" If you take a risk and get away with it, you're a hero. If you fail and die, you were a reckless fool. " Dave wrote: "The hero/reckless fool categorization is a media creation, and is not based on much knowledge or competent information. " The hero/fool divide is seen in journalist's choices in how they spin a story, sure. So far, the Australian and New Zealand media have been restrained about Andrew, in what I've read. No condemnation, anyway. Media interest has now passed. But there is a real division. Anyone taking great risk like Andrew, with whatever skill and preparation, is still going to need a good dose of luck. If "stuff happens", did the adventurer understand the magnitude of the impending disaster before taking on the risk? Does anyone really have an idea of what they are doing when playing with their own life? Modern affluent societies insulate people against death. It more often occurs out of sight in a hospital wards, rather than side-by-side hand-to-hand combat. Is a life-threatening risk an essential part of high-end adventure? I feel it is likely that someone else will eventually try a trans Tasman Sea kayak crossing, under the 40th parallel, and succeed. That person will need to make a life and death decision whether to launch, before committing to the crossing. What nerve will be required! Will it be worth it? *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sat Mar 24 2007 - 18:15:31 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:23 PDT