On 7/3/07, Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com> wrote: > I guess I don't see any statistics here. Caffyn took his average daily mileage before rudder installation and compared it with his average daily mileage after rudder installation and published that figure. That is a statstical analysis; however rudimentary Again, the value in Caffyn's data is that it was a byproduct of the agenda not the agenda itself. The results, according to Caffyn, surprised him because prior to the modifications of his kayak he was unwilling to believe that there would be any benefits. > He has not done anything to raise it above the level of > anecdote. So you don't think that the daily records of mileages on a trip of that length amounts to any more than "anecdotal"? And how would you "raise" data to something above anecdotal? I have the feeling that we are talking at cross-purposes here. Anecdotal data would not be a series of mileage entries. It would be something on the order of, "I must've paddled 100 miles that day." The fact that Caffyn is an "expert" makes it an anecdote > worth paying attention to, but his conclusions are still capable > being mistaken. Well, aren't all conclusions capable of being mistaken? And, again, why would his records be anecdotal? Craig Jungers Royal City, WA *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Jul 03 2007 - 13:55:58 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:25 PDT