Before you can answer the question you must first settle the question "best for what?" What works for surfing down a wave may not be very good for maintaining control in a cross wind. The differences in the bows may not reflect an "improvement" in technology but may be an indication of a change in how the boats were used, or they could be a result of a change in aesthetic fashion without really effecting the aspect of performance that was important to the Aleuts. On Aug 5, 2007, at 11:49 PM, Paul Montgomery wrote: > Sorry if this has been covered before, but I am curious as to which > baidarka bow type is "best". Looking once again to Zimmerly's site > > http://www.arctickayaks.com/plans.htm > > there are the > MAE593-76 - both pieces straight > LM2-14886 - the upturned fore piece > Kodiak3-holeMAE536 - both upturned > > Perhaps Zimmerly covers this somewhere ( my copy of the book will be > here later this week ). > > Apparently the first example ( both pieces straight ) fell out of > style about 1850. So I assume that the others are technologically > "more advanced". A change in style usually comes from new needs or > perhaps different seas or even materials/tools. > > Does anyone here have hands on experience of what the differences are > in the styles? Nick Schade Guillemot Kayaks 824 Thompson St Glastonbury, CT 06033 USA Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847 http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/ *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Aug 07 2007 - 21:14:52 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:26 PDT