Re: [Paddlewise] The Pros and Cons of being at sea (or elsewhere) with cameras.

From: Tord Eriksson <tord_at_tord.nu>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:13:02 +0100
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 06:20, you wrote:
> Interesting perspective on camers:
>
> http://www.wavelengthmagazine.com/2002/as02rainforest.php
>
> Doug Lloyd
>
> Tord said (snip):
> > Eventually, I come to the conclusion, that a light
> > camera, preferably waterproof, and possibly a small
> > camcorder, also waterproof, is the best way. Pen and
> > paper works for the real quiet moments, but a camera
> > of some sort captures the moment in an instant, and they
> > can be ideal support for your memory, say for your later
> > artwork/writing.

The amount of pollution classic wet film cameras are
responisble for is amazing - digitals win hand down!

Big film labs, when their water treatment isn't top notch,
can easily kill entire water treatment plants, through the
very potent toxins involved in developing, and manufacture,
of film and pictures!

Tord
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Wed Nov 07 2007 - 04:08:43 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:27 PDT