Re: [Paddlewise] When is a Kayak Not a Kayak?

From: Duane Strosaker <strosaker_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:04:44 -0800 (PST)
Peter R.,
   
  I'd call it a boat powered by double bladed paddles, but it will be a spectacular feat nontheless. And more so, if I was going to cross such a large body of water, I'd want and consider it prudent to be in a similar boat rather than a kayak.
   
  Duane
  Southern California
  www.rollordrown.com
  

Peter Rattenbury <ratten_at_uow.edu.au> wrote:
  While I admire the entrepreneurial skill and daring of the two lads
paddling their way to New Zealand from Australia I would question the
description of their craft as a 'kayak'.



How many kayaks weigh in at 930kg, cost around A$250,000 and boast a
two-man sleeping pod? How would you describe this craft? A high-tech
ocean going two-man paddle-powered survival craft ? It surely can't be
classed in the same category as the kayaks that people such as Lindeman,
Speck, McCauley etc used. This doesn't detract one iota from their
effort, but I think their set up puts them more in the category of the
rowers who have crossed the Atlantic etc in purpose built craft.



http://www.crossingtheditch.com.au/news/day-two.html



Cheers, PeterR
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu Nov 15 2007 - 20:04:52 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:27 PDT