[ I've flipped the order of part your remarks so that (hopefully) my response will make more sense. Maybe. ;-) ] On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:28:05PM -0800, Brad Crain wrote: > I know our white water canoe class never covered such things. If your WW canoe class didn't include basic instruction on how to at least spot holes and understand their effects, then your WW canoe class was inadequate. One of the first things that I try to do with new WW paddlers is to get them to swim through a (quite benign) hole so that they get a visceral appreciation of it. Granted, beginner paddlers are probably not going to be capable of doing much more in a hole than "flip and swim", but by the time they get to be intermediates, they'll need to be able to show at least some boat control in friendly holes and know at least a couple ways to get out of them while still in their boats. And one of the things that I emphasize with intermediates is using river features (including holes) to execute maneuvers, for example, turning into a hole's backwash to initiate an upstream ferry. So for beginners, I think it's pretty important to prep them for all this by making sure they ample motivation to pay attention when I say things like "you really want to miss the hole on river left". > Floating down the Clackamas River in summer is an urban show, with the > ramps only a dozen or so miles from the city. It attracts many more > recreational rafters and tubers than kayakers or canoeists, usually > young and packing beer, noisy, etc. There is a general party atmosphere > all summer. I believe the kayakers and canoeists generally recognize > most of the dangers, such as strainers and rocks lurking just below the > surface or above the surface. But I'll bet hardly any of them appreciate > the hydraulics and dynamics laying below large vertical or overhanging > rock formations, of which there are many. [ quoting myself from another list late last week... ] Circa 1986, I was on the Gauley River in West Virginia...and along on the trip was a veteran, grizzled raft guide. We were all pretty busy trying not to be killed in nasty ways, so there wasn't a lot of time to admire the scenery -- which is spectacular. But in one of the brief pools, one of us happened to look up and notice people standing high above us on the edge of a cliff. No fence. No rail. Nothing. He asked the guide about it -- whether anyone had ever fallen off -- and the guide replied with one of the most profound statements I've ever heard anyone make about risk in outdoor sports: Dumbf**ks deserve to die. Of course, not everyone who dies while doing outdoor sports is stupid: some people do everything right and die anyway. But that's part of the activity: those who can't accept that possibility should stay on the couch. And those who stack the deck against themselves, by going out in bad conditions, or without appropriate knowledge, or without appropriate skills, or without decent equipment, or while intoxicated, etc., should have no complaint when nature takes its course and culls the herd. So I don't see a problem here that needs solving. Moreover -- having seen similar parades on other rivers (e.g., Delaware, Potomac, Shenandoah, Brandywine, etc.) I can safely guarantee you that putting up signs would have precisely zero effect on the behavior of the people most in need of having their behavior affected. (See above pithy comment by raft guide.) The most likely problem to emerge -- again, based on experience elsewhere -- is that ignorant local officials will react to The Latest Tragedy, whatever it is and whenever it happens (and never mind that the label "tragedy" doesn't really apply to an event in which stupid people try very hard to kill themselves and perhaps succeed), by trying to enact regulations ostensibly designed to stop The Next Tragedy, but having as their main result the inconveniencing of people who actually know what they're doing. A local example of this is the Lehigh River in NE Pennsylvania. The PA state park system closes off their access points to the river -- including one that's the only one for miles in either direction (Rockport) -- when it reaches a high enough level. They do this in order to avoid the costs of possible rescues as will as the legal liability. One byproduct of this is that people like me, who are competent to run the river at any level including well above flood stage, are barred as well. (Yes, I've run it anyway, and no doubt will do so again. Happily, when it's up that high, the intermediate access point isn't really needed, as it's possible to paddle the entire 20-mile-or-so White Haven to Jim Thorpe run in an afternonn without much trouble.) So...here is what will happen if signs/regulations/whatever are put in place: 1. The people who need to pay attention to them won't. 2. The people who don't need to pay attention to them will be needlessly annoyed and inconvenienced. 3. Eventually, some enterprising ambulance-chasing attorney will spot an opportunity and will file a multi-million dollar lawsuit whose premise is "officials knew of 17 hazards but only posted 16 and the lack of a sign at the 17th is why my idiot client hurt themself there" or "the sign marking the hazard was underwater during the 500-year-flood and therefore not visible to my idiot client, who chose that day to be on the river" or "the sign was written only in English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, and Japanese, but not Urdu" or other such premises. The ensuing litigation will chew up money and waste the court system's time. It will also provoke more signage/regulations as well as an increase in the cost of someone's liability coverage. It might also cause someone to set up a bureaucracy to issues "permits" (for a fee, of course), or which requires possession of "certifications" (issued by some entity, also for a fee, of course). Lather, rinse, repeat. ---Rsk *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Dec 21 2007 - 08:02:07 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:28 PDT