PaddleWise by thread

From: Doug Lloyd <douglloyd_at_shaw.ca>
subject: [Paddlewise] Fw: Another CG Search based on a lack of "OK" messages
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 20:38:33 -0700
This didn't make the list earlier.

DL

>
> It is ironic that for years responsible paddling tactics have included the 
> used of a float plan, which hasn't had the uptake it should have in my 
> opinion; now we have the SPOT device, basically providing a 
> float-plan-like followup scenerio, but is casing some false-alarm issues. 
> Perhaps the old float plan was one where the follow-up by those back home 
> was initiated subsequent to the end of the trip (post-trip lack of 
> communication). The SPOT devices is kind of like a float plan check-in 
> every couple of days, so naturally there will be more cases of false 
> alarm. Interestingly, when I leave a float plan with my spouse, she is 
> instructed to always allow a couple of extra days for a multi-day trip to 
> allow for the posibility of an unforsceen delay; likewise, for a day trip, 
> I always suggest a few extra hours or even a day - after all, if I'm dead 
> in the water, I'm really dead in the water and time will not be a critical 
> issue.
>
> The only critical time window is the response time for a 911 SPOT message, 
> and that I would like to see more data on.
>
> The lack of an OKAY message Craig highlighted off theWCP forum, was kind 
> of timely as far as coincidence with our recent discussion. I for one 
> think the SPOT holds a lot of promise for multiple applications but 
> continue to keep my ears to the water to see what transpires. It will be 
> interesting to get feedback from Bob re his discusions back in Alaska with 
> his SAR buddies.
>
> BTW, lots of SAR volunteer positions avaliable in BC - seems to be always 
> a need for more volunteers. Don't know why that could be. :-)
>
> Doug Lloyd
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Mark Sanders <sandmarks_at_ca.rr.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Fw: Another CG Search based on a lack of "OK" messages
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:44:37 -0700
This is the "unique challenge" of the SPOT. Anyone could file a float plan,
but few did; many more are likely to buy a SPOT--we just like gadgets.
People who filed a float plan were probably more responsible to begin with
and worked out contingencies for non contact issues. People who buy a SPOT
might often feel no more is needed than to press a button.

Mark

-----Original Message-----

On Behalf Of Doug Lloyd

> It is ironic that for years responsible paddling tactics have included the
> used of a float plan, which hasn't had the uptake it should have in my
> opinion; now we have the SPOT device, basically providing a
> float-plan-like followup scenerio, but is casing some false-alarm issues.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:49 PDT