Scott Hilliard wrote: > A criteria that I have frequently relied on is, "how will this look > written up in an article in Sea Kayaker Magazine." You know, as a paid > leader with considerable experience, I will be the one to whom all the > fingers will be pointing if things go bad. This can be a tremendous > burden, but one I have to bear. The next time your out paddling with a > group try to imagine that you are in charge and your own reputation as > well as the reputation of the company you are working for is on the line > with this trip. Then see if that doesn't temp you to do thing a little > differently. Scott, I've been in your shoes, guiding in the mountains, many decades of liability litigation ago. I think I understand where you are coming from: a for-hire guide has to make sure he/she lays out the risks plainly in full-on CYA fashion, not just to make sure that participants are fully warned, but so that the groundwork is laid to protect everyone from legal repercussions. I'm for cutting some slack for folks who lead trips. That, however, does not answer several questions raised by Mark's description: 1. Were there definite guidelines for immersion protection wear? If not, why not? 2. If the trip leader felt a participant was not up to the task, once on the water, why did he not surgically remove the participant by placing him/her on the chase boat and proceed? 3. Why was so much time onshore wasted before launching ... given that a group of uncertain composition needed to pass some defined barriers to reach their safe takeout beach(es)? 4. Was there a clear statement of skills needed by each participant as a floor for participation? If not, why not? Finally, to return to "... how will this look if written up ... in Sea kayaker Magazine?" Stuff happens on the water. Most of us judge how well a situation is handled, not whether or not trouble was encountered. Contrast Mark's account with Rob Gibbert's detailed, eloquent tale (SK, August 2008; see below) of a trip gone bad in the San Juans. Rob enumerates a completely different culture and practice of sea kayaking trip-leading behavior, in which it is dog-plain the group was tightly organized; had prepared for cold water rescues; was able to execute alternate strategies; and, had a pre-planned, agreed-on bailout agreement for group separation. All were important in overcoming an error in judgment made by the trip leader (allowing an under-prepared participant to continue). How did it look? Beautiful. Rob's group was prepared and ready for contingencies. They laid the groundwork for success. Everyone went home intact. [Rob's article: http://www.seakayakermag.com/2008/October/capesize.htm ] -- Dave Kruger Astoria, OR *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Jan 12 2009 - 06:09:07 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:31 PDT