On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Jackie Myers <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>wrote: > > > Great news! Thanks for the report. Was there any consideration by LE to > charge him with theft since he actually admitted that he took it from > private property? Did he give a reason why he didn't report it to > authorities since he says he thought it was stolen? (of course, he *knew* it > was stolen) As far as I can tell he made no attempt to locate the "rightful owner". He certainly knew it wasn't his. He just waited six months and put the items up for sale on craigslist. One might almost think he was waiting for the heat to go off. We could have charged him with theft but the criminal case was weakened when we went onto his property and seized the kayak. State laws vary but in general if an item is in "plain view" then it's fair game for seizure by law enforcement (at least in Washington). Our problem was that in order to see the kayak (to have it in "plain view") we had to go up to his place of business (in a shed in a yard at the back of the house). The deputy went to the door of the business looking for the seller (who was not there). Once he was at that door he then look to his right and saw the kayak. He examined the kayak enough to make him think that it was my kayak. At that point he asked his prosecutor and received permission (e.g.: that it was legal) to take me to the business location and show me the kayak and allow me to identify it to the deputy's satisfaction. At this point we had some options... but only one of them included me taking the kayak home right then. Remember that I'm 5 hours from home and across a major mountain range, it's winter, and if you remember just a couple of weeks ago the Puget Sound area was isolated by storms... every land route was blocked. I was also concerned that in order to charge the seller with a crime it might have been necessary to keep my kayak and associated equipment as evidence of the crime instead of letting me paddle it around. So I decided that since I had come to that point with the desire of regaining my property that I'd just take it home with me and not pursue it any more. The seller had already assured over the phone that he was convinced that it was my kayak so I was within my rights as the owner of the property to seize it. Once the kayak was identified as my stolen property then taking it was merely restoring my property to me. Had the kayak been inside a building, or hidden in a shed, or not in "plain view" from a point at which a person could reasonably have been without trespassing, then we would have had to wait for the seller to come give us permission to enter his property. It was unlikely that we could keep a deputy on site for the 4 or 5 hours it would take for the seller to get off work. > > Well, at least you have it back mostly in original shape. With any luck Matt will have some ideas about replacing the seat slide. > > A big thanks to Matt for his efforts to recover/report stolen kayaks for > folks! > Absolutely!!! Matt's database is an important asset. I also want to give a big vote of thanks to the WCP member who tipped me off to the ad. He was looking for a Mariner and he could have bought this one (it was only $500) but he was made of sterner stuff than that.. Craig Jungers Moses Lake, WA *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Jan 16 2009 - 08:29:41 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:31 PDT