Jerry wrote: > Doug wrote: >>Nordkapp LV is incredibly fast off the line but still a demanding kayak >>that requires the paddler to take care of themselves. Boat will not do it >>for you. All need a little skeg now and again. > > In general, Doug, what is gained from a kayak that is demanding vs a > similar one that is not as demanding? It is not like the Tiderace or > Romany are inferior to the NLV in conditions because they are less > demanding. What is lost from a bit of stability provided by these > similarly purposed boats, or gained from the twitchy quickness of the NLV? > > Jerry Well Jerry and all, good evening. That's the question a lot of instructors ask too in terms of a boat for themselves, especially as a Romany used for instruction allows pedagogical concentration toward the student, allowing the instructor to not need to pay as much attention to balance, etc. Similarly, the Romany-like hulls undergoing initiated strokes are more responsive to the applied implementation allowing all parties a better visual reference. This obviously translates well not only for instruction but into a kayak that takes better care of you on an expedition or in textured water with faceted hydraulics from unexpected quarters. Good paddlers like Shauna of BBB switched out of Nordkapps and into NDK designs some time ago for precisely these reasons. Advanced paddlers and instructors like Mike at Ecomarine also made the same move - even more so as some of the NDK hulls do well even without a skeg, which is unlikely with the Valley designs. Duff applied this logic to his expeditioning paddling, gaining not only cargo capacity, but an "uncomplication" too. His hull responsiveness meant excellent maneuverability in heavy surf zones. So, why the heck a twitchy Nordkapp? Well the LV is a different kettle of fish, and a Nordkapp in name only to a degree. Test paddles have confirmed this for me. While the LV is fast off the line, the Classic and the Jubilee are still better long-range paddling machines, though the LV doesn't need the weight in it to enjoy day-tripping.And there is a difference between play boater requirements for rock gardens/surf/tideraces versus open ocean storm play. The later isn't a big draw. Look at the cross-comparison charts on the Point 65 web site. Play boats de-escalate performance in big open water conditions. As for your implied assertion, I'd agree that the more relaxing Tiderace or Romany is an equal performer for most tastes without the twitchy preponderance. However, one should also bear witness to maritime hydrodynamic tradition and realize that the Nordkapp hull even through the latest itineration shares a heritage with classic Viking hulls as well as took inception form Inuit proven form.Those who love their Nordys can't express exactly what draws them to pursue the learning curve associated with paddling these hulls in advanced conditions, or why they put up with the difficulty of even something as simple as getting a camera out of the day hatch. I can say that when I sit and paddle a Romany, the front bow gyrates with each paddle stroke. When I'm parallel in a beam sea with these other kayak designs alongside me, the Norkapp hull stays in a lateral groove you can't help but not ignore. When I'm sweep and I have to race forward 1000 yards to catch the leader or race off to herd in strays, the Nordy delivers. In an all-day slog in lumpy, short-period seas, the tight-ass Nordy delivers consistent sea-kindly rides - all be it with continued attention. When you spend hours clawing up over wave tops in a contrary head sea, it's magic (poor planning, poor luck, but hey, it happens). Valley makes lots of non-twitchy kayak designs good for comfort and gear capacity. Thousands of other paddlers make their own kayaks, many much more twitchy and lower volume - and love to paddle them. Bjorn over in Euroland can design-up a boat to fit your anthromorphic parameters and give you whatever range of design criteria you want from his current selection, but it'll never be a Nordkapp experience. So there, that's it. It's the Nordkapp experience. Maybe not the _in general_ answer you were looking for, but the twitchy-prone Nordkapps aren't a generalist kayak. And why it is when things get really bad out there, really bad, the Nordkapp owners aren't headed in yet? Hard to answer. Hard to fathom. Subjective righting-moment perceptions (as opposed to my subjective writing moments, or perhaps in conert with them, heh, heh)? And if I have to tow someone for 6 hours in a gale, I know what I want to be paddling. But heck Mr. Jerry, an Explorer will always get you home.Paddlers working to the advanced level, out on expeditions, benefit well. Talk to Gordin W. And SK Magazine readersagreed with you this year that these NDKs are "the" solution. Be cool Jerry. You've always had a problem with this stability thing, I think. That's okay. It's all good. Maybe it's just a different blood that flows in some kayakers' veins, to accept the "twitchy is more fun so more active so more stable so actually less tippy in a bad sea situation" notion. I can only really speak for myself: for me that blood is the same blood that babbles in the mountain brooks down through raging rivers and rages mightily in tempestuous seas. It is, you see, a certain essential wildness. Doug Lloyd *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri May 08 2009 - 00:38:34 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:35 PDT