Well Craig, just buy a Nordkapp and you can become a 360 degree water man too (unlike Paul who is a 360 degree ditch man). :-) Doug Lloyd > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Doug Lloyd <douglloyd_at_shaw.ca> wrote: > >> >> Your original notion that a performance sea kayak with slightly more >> stability (primary and secondary in equal measure perhaps) should be more >> desirable that one without this improvement if that design retains >> similar >> performance roles is one I cannot disagree with. Who can? Craig has >> brought >> this issue up in earnest here before. >> >> Well yeah... I have. I'm still grappling with the idea of an 18-foot boat > being a "playboat"; but maybe it's because only 14 feet of it is actually > in > the water. > > But I'm starting to see that it's a matter of what you like. Let's face > it, > sitting on top of a 1-ton bull is downright stupid; but it's probably fun > to > see if you can do it and someone else can't. So there are people who sit > on > top of 1-ton bulls. In the same vein there are people who sit inside a > boat > that is too unstable to let them reach behind them for their lunch. > > It's no secret that I love the way a couple of the Mariner kayaks move in > the water. I love to edge a boat and have it begin to carve a turn or have > it settle in on a boat wake without the need for a brace. I like to sit > out > in front of my house and wait for some board boat to trundle by ballasted > deep in the water and catch its wake for 100 yards and then turn around > and > wait for the next one. But while I'm waiting I like to relax and watch the > bikin.... er, birds. > > Matt Broze has made the case that a well-designed boat needs neither > rudder > nor skeg and has put his mouth where his laptop is with a half-dozen hulls > that really don't much need either of those. Unless you call the sliding > seat a device designed to eliminate the flaws of the boat itself (which I > don't think it is... but you could make that case). I like that subtlety > of > purpose. > > So if you actually *like* having a boat that you need to keep one paddle > in > the water for at all times and stay alert then who am I to say you're > wrong? > And Robert's point that all kayaks under about 24" wide are unstable in > one > way or another is a valid point that underscores the entire discussion. > > I just prefer to paddle a boat that doesn't *try* to kill me if my > attention > wanders a bit. :D > > Craig Jungers > Moses Lake, WA > www.nwkayaking.net *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon May 11 2009 - 21:36:01 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:35 PDT