On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Paul Hayward <pdh_at_mmcl.co.nz> wrote: > > Do most night-time paddlers comply ? > Do your 'relatively low-luminance' lights meet the 0,54 nm (1 km) > requirements ? > Do you find them effective at keeping other boats at bay ? > > The answer to these would be interesting. I'd also like to know how these lights affect their vision at night (and the vision of anyone paddling near them). But I cannot see how any steady light mounted anywhere on a kayak could help but interfere with night vision. Your blue light is great for being seen but terrible for your night vision, by the way. There is a reason we have red lights on the bridge at night. I have a lot of problems with these disparate local regulations. One problem is that it makes it more difficult to know what rules to follow. Another problem is that they are seldom written by people who have any experience in the field they are attempting to regulate. But my major problem is that it seems that local jurisdictions are finding it easier to target kayakers than to target powerboaters. Imagine the uproar if a municipality decided to require all pedestrians to wear special vests during the day and lights at night because that made them more visible to drivers. Requiring a kayak to have TWO white lights seems to me to be targeting the potential victims because targeting the potential perpetrators is too great a task. And it's easy because to the average citizen (and even, apparently, to some kayakers) it's just common sense to make a kayak have lights; and the more the better. But there are already rules requiring mariners to operate their vessels at safe speeds and in a safe manner. Why not just enforce these? Politicians certainly love paper solutions. They can point to their "solution" and proudly claim that they did something to stop the problem of kayakers being run over by powerboats. Then they can use that to get re-elected. The average person already thinks kayakers are crazy people too stupid to know how to be safe so we make easy targets. This is why I prefer to have one set of rules (the ColRegs) applicable everywhere. It eliminates the knee-jerk reaction of passing a rule after a local accident. Once you have international regulations you can then use education - and the enforcement of existing rules - to begin to solve the problems. Craig Jungers Moses Lake, WA www.nwpaddling.net *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sun Jun 28 2009 - 16:42:36 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:36 PDT