On Saturday, 18 July 2009 01:41, Craig Jungers <pdh_at_mmcl.co.nz> wrote: > my GP (and maybe its my own fault) has given the term "flutter" a whole new definition I am not going to put my neck out too far here... I'm sure there are more expert GP enthusiasts on Paddlewise. Seven of us in NZ got seriously interested in GPs about 5 years ago, when we had our noses rubbed in their capabilities by a roving fella from Montana (Shawn, you have a lot to answer for). We built some, used them, built others and compared notes. Two years later, we were lucky enough to get some input from Cherie, Greg & Turner - but we've probably managed to distil our very own set of bad habits and misconceptions. But we're all still using them and the number using them has grown. We found that the 'correct' size (according to Holst & Heath) seemed ideal for a low-volume rolling SoF, but that we enjoyed a somewhat longer GP for a more conventional composite sea kayak. This was especially true for use in a double. Of course, I also used to find that true when I used a Euro paddle in a double - I'd extend my centre lock a bit. The idea that sitting higher and in a wider boat begged for a longer paddle, grew on us. As we learned to use the GPs, most of us took a month of paddling (say 10-20 hours) to feel we were getting some skill. During this period, we steadily reduced the flutter and 'grumbling' of our GPs. As I got the technique better in the single, I could detect a major step backwards when I jumped into the double - so I decided to make a longer paddle for use in the double. That worked well and then one day, when I tried it in the single, all the residual grumble went away and I settled on it as an improvement. My first paddle was 2300mm (96.1") and when I went longer I added 100mm to each end - to give 2500 (98.4"). There was nothing magic (or engineered) about the 100mm, I just decided to make it 'significantly' longer and then trim it back until I found a 'sweet spot.' I've never trimmed it back and all my subsequent paddles (lighter ones, stronger ones, hollow ones, splits - I've played around some) have remained at that length. Natasha took longer to get interested in a GP and never liked her 'correct' length one much. She has used (and loved) the longer version for about 4 years and some serious mileage. Later, looking at the paddles in the Peterborough (Canada) museum - and in various books - I can see that the range of paddle length is huge. Perhaps it's fair to say that the longer they are, the narrower they seem to be. But I'm not expert on why. I find that my long paddle is very good for racing (say 2 hours) and good for touring (say 12 hours). It punches out better through surf (where I feel the GP is least effective) and starts to make my shoulders ache going into a headwind. Probably no surprises here - and likely paralleled in the world of euro blades. If you don't mind playing around with your GP, I'd suggest gluing a 50mm extension onto each end and going for a blast. Best Regards Paul Hayward, Auckland, New Zealand *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Jul 17 2009 - 07:49:06 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:37 PDT