PaddleWise by thread

From: skimmer <skimmer_at_enter.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] efficient stroke
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:07:11 4
I agree with Jim 100%. That stuff about the Scandanavians is most 
interesting and describes my stroke in large measure. I have 
practiced my stroke for about 30 years. I have a stroke rate of 
about 40 strokes/minute at 4+ knots. When I am "in shape", I can 
do that all day long.

Chuck Sutherland
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] efficient stroke
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:53:48 -0700
Jim's comments about adapting your stroke to your own physiognomy is spot 
on.  That said, the type of paddle you have also affects which style is 
most efficient.

Times I have used Becky's paddle (designed for higher angle stroking), I 
have achieved higher hull speed, but I also was getting tired faster.

The original poster asked for _efficiency_ in paddling, not speed.

For that, I have to go with the angle and style the paddle was designed 
for.  Twisting a low-angle-style paddle into high angle is not as efficient 
as using it low-angle style.  Yes, I can go faster if I force it into high 
angle style, but I think it is less efficient that way.

A good rhythm with good torso rotation is key for the most efficient style, 
for me.  When I had joints and tendons which could take the abuse, a longer 
paddle was also more efficient.  Nowadays my stick is shorter, and my 
cadence is much higher, so I use what I got.  Plus, I have a cute way of 
getting off [snicker].

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Craig Jungers <crjungers_at_gmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] efficient stroke
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:18:34 -0700
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com> wrote:

> Plus, I have a cute way of getting off [snicker].
>
>
Uh oh... I can see the deterioration in *this* thread is not far off. :P

It's easy to confuse paddling styles with paddle stroke. It's only sensible
that rotating the upper body helps. What I guess I was trying to get at was;
is there a sign of an efficient paddle stroke? And if there is, what is it?
I know it's not a lack of paddle drips on the spray deck. My wing paddle
throws a *lot* of water but is the fastest thing I've ever paddled with. If
I try to stop throwing water off the back then it slows down... so I stopped
trying. It also makes a distinctive "plop" sound when I have the catch just
right. But this is paddle-specific. Is a quieter paddle stroke more
efficient? One that doesn't throw water?

Jim Tibensky's remarks about moving the paddle away from the boat at the end
of the stroke also seems (to me) to be faster. In fact I find myself
levering down on the shaft of my standard euros some to get more speed. Much
like a modified wing stroke. But I try to keep my catch vertical.

I'm in the throes of Tour de France fever right now so I might not be
totally comprehensible for another 2-1/2 weeks. Yesterday's team trials were
so incredible that I had to breathe into a paper bag for 30 minutes
afterwards. :P

Chris Cunningham of Sea Kayaker Magazine has some questions about the size
of a sea kayak and whether old notions are still relevant. Link is at:

http://www.seakayakermag.com/2009/09e-newsletters/july/sizingup.htm

It seems like good fodder for this group.


Craig Jungers
Moses Lake, WA
www.nwkayaking.net
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Darryl Johnson <Darryl.Johnson_at_sympatico.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] efficient stroke
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:51:12 -0400
Craig Jungers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com> wrote:
> 
>> Plus, I have a cute way of getting off [snicker].
>>
>>
> Uh oh... I can see the deterioration in *this* thread is not far off. :P
> 
> It's easy to confuse paddling styles with paddle stroke. It's only sensible
> that rotating the upper body helps. What I guess I was trying to get at was;
> is there a sign of an efficient paddle stroke? And if there is, what is it?
> I know it's not a lack of paddle drips on the spray deck. My wing paddle
> throws a *lot* of water but is the fastest thing I've ever paddled with. If
> I try to stop throwing water off the back then it slows down... so I stopped
> trying. It also makes a distinctive "plop" sound when I have the catch just
> right. But this is paddle-specific. Is a quieter paddle stroke more
> efficient? One that doesn't throw water?
> 
> Jim Tibensky's remarks about moving the paddle away from the boat at the end
> of the stroke also seems (to me) to be faster. In fact I find myself
> levering down on the shaft of my standard euros some to get more speed. Much
> like a modified wing stroke. But I try to keep my catch vertical.
> 
> I'm in the throes of Tour de France fever right now so I might not be
> totally comprehensible for another 2-1/2 weeks. Yesterday's team trials were
> so incredible that I had to breathe into a paper bag for 30 minutes
> afterwards. :P

I didn't have to do the paper bag trick, but I was getting pretty 
excited at the end of yesterday's stage (the TTT) and was quite 
obviously hoping that Lance was going to get the maillot jaune.

Nothing gets done around here until the morning's coverage of the Tour 
is done. (I do at least make myself a coffee, but then it's me in my 
housecoat sitting in front of the telly until the stage is over. I 
usually miss the presentations because I have to pee so bad by that time.)

> 
> Chris Cunningham of Sea Kayaker Magazine has some questions about the size
> of a sea kayak and whether old notions are still relevant. Link is at:
> 
> http://www.seakayakermag.com/2009/09e-newsletters/july/sizingup.htm
>

I'm not quite as convinced about the *length* of the boat as I am 
about the volume. I have tall friends with high volume boats who have 
a bitch of a time trying to turn in higher winds. It's partially a 
foot size issue, that requires them to move into a high volume boat; 
but I think it's often a thigh length issue. Their thighs are too long 
to allow them to get into a 'normal' keyhole cockpit unless the height 
of the front deck is raised to give them a better angle at getting 
their legs in. A lower front deck combined with a longer cockpit might 
be an answer, but no one seems to be making such a beast.

I can see that an 'average' person (of average strength and average 
kayaking skills) would have difficulties with a longer boat in adverse 
conditions. A shorter boat is just that much easier to manoeuvre -- 
for most people.

But, unless you have the space, and the cash, to own several boats, 
most of us go with one or two compromise boats: space for enough gear 
for multi-day trips, good in big water, good on flatwater, decent 
tracking, but decent turning too.... Length is pretty low on the 
priorities list (in my experience.)

-- 
   Darryl


> It seems like good fodder for this group.
> 
> 
> Craig Jungers
> Moses Lake, WA
> www.nwkayaking.net
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Richard Culpeper <culpeper_at_tbaytel.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] efficient stroke
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:30:14 -0400
Most efficient stroke?  That would be when I am coaching a 40' dragon boat
crew, for the canoe goes very fast, but I do not have to expend any more
energy than when I sit in the office and talk on the telephone.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:51 PDT