PaddleWise by thread

From: Martin, Jack <martin.jack_at_solute.us>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Oil on the Waters
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:18:35 -0600
 Jim wrote, <I never cease to be amazed by what the Paddlewise folks can
do with even the smallest opening subject.> 

This might indicate that Jim missed the years of Professor Inverbon on
PaddleWise; he had a unique ability to transpose almost any topic into
fascinating, sometimes prurient legends from the past -- from
Greenlandic legends and beyond.

Has anyone -- by some wonderful chance -- cataloged any of his
narratives?  At least the ones that made it past the censors -- oooh,
belay that last: we've never had them.  At least the best ones?

Joq
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: James <jimtibensky_at_fastmail.fm>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Oil on the Waters
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:04:51 -0500
Jack wrote: This might indicate that Jim missed the years of Professor
Inverbon on PaddleWise.




No, Jack, I was around to have the pleasure of reading some of the
Prof's writing.  It's been so long, I had forgotten about him.  And my
'never cease to be amazed' wasn't meant to exclude anyone.

Anyone who still uses the word "dirigible" should never be forgotten. 
Our local whitewater club, the cleverly named Chicago Whitewater
Association, used to have an advice columnist named "Dr. CWA, Charles
Whitewater Athwart, PfD, BFRM" who had a similar ability to make a
molehill out of mountain through something like 'reductio ad absurdum.' 
The Prof and the Doc are both missing, and missed, these days.


Jim Tibensky
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Oil on the Waters
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:39:16 -0700
Martin, Jack wrote:

> This might indicate that Jim missed the years of Professor Inverbon on 
> PaddleWise; Has anyone -- by some wonderful chance -- cataloged any of
> his narratives?

Here is one, below the sig.  Not for the PC-afflicted.  I think John would 
OK a re-posting.

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
--

"Inverbon and Bifid Bows"  -- from John Winters

Some thoughts on Baidarka bows from the eminent anthropologist Prof. 
Peregrine Inverbon.


It is so gratifying that paddlers are taking an interest in the 
technological innovations of Inuit kayak builders and particularly that of 
bow development which exhibits such imaginative diversity. The Inuit were 
highly sensitive people who could detect small variations in force that 
they detected by testing fluid flow around various body parts. Although not 
always successfully nor comfortable for the testee. Some parts had no 
relevance to boats as they were shaped in such a way that they could never 
be used and others provided misleading results due to scale. Nevertheless, 
being an open minded people, they learned from their mistakes.

Due to the effects of scale, boats built along the shape of body parts did 
not always perform as well as expected. It could not have taken them long 
to recognize that friction and wavemaking increased at differing rates and 
in different proportion to size. Being somewhat nomadic they did not remain 
in one place long enough to build test tanks. They solved the problem 
ingeniously by towing wives behind their kayaks and measuring the drag by 
pulling on the tow line. In this manner, they discovered the importance of 
narrow beam as skinny wives towed much more easily than fat wives. Fat 
wives, however complained less about being towed and the noise of thin 
wives complaining about the cold water hindered the scientist's 
concentration. This problem turned out to be an asset when an Inuit 
hydrodynamicist held his wife's head under water to shut her up and 
serendipitously discovered the bulb bow.

None of this would have been possible without a form of higher math and we 
are indebted to Professor Klohr who observed what appeared to be random 
arrangements of rocks of a King Island beach that he spotted as a form of 
Inuit Braille writing.

Klohr was able to translate some of what he saw but some passages stymied 
him. At a conference in Calcutta he showed pictures of the stone Braille to 
Professor Hoomani who recognized mathematical patterns in the parts that 
baffled Klohr. His research revealed that they were calculations of wetted 
surface using Simpson's Rule and resistance calculations using something 
similar to Holtrop's formula. All, of course, predating Simpson and 
Holtrop. The calculations reveal that the Inuit believed wave making 
resistance increased with the fifth power of speed and friction with the 
third power. This caused them to overestimate their power output. 
Unfortunately, many mathematicians had excessive faith in their results 
and, overconfident, challenged polar bears to arm wrestling contests. The 
polar bears, unable to do math and not knowing they were weaker than the 
Inuit, invariably won. This would not have been a serious problem except 
that the winner got to eat the loser. Hoomani believes that this explains 
why there are so few Inuit mathematicians today.

Why, then, did not other Inuit groups develop the bifid bow?  Klohr 
believes that the western Arctic promoted more hydrodynamic research than 
the central or eastern Arctic because they did not have the same large 
herds of caribou that made Crotch Dirigibles possible. Paulson, on the 
other hand,  suggests that Haplo group C lacked the genetic mathematical 
skills of  the M217 group thus explaining the lack of hydrodynamic research 
in the Eastern Arctic. We may never know. The Inuit were practical people 
and may have just seen no need to research hydrodynamics when they had the 
Crotch Dirigible and a thriving cocaine importing trade.

I suppose we will never know for certain although we may speculate with 
certainty.


Sincerely,

  Dr. Peregrine Inverbon, Ph.d., DD, LL.d, Ph.g

Translated from the original by John Winters
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:51 PDT