Why not consult a hydrologist or hydraulics engineer or even a physicist? There's probably one in your neighborhood. If all else fails, call Oprah. Brad > Craig Jungers wrote: > >> Well I'll go along with that. But I can think of a couple of ways to >> actually measure current speed to see how fast the current actually ramps >> up. I'm pretty sure that in constricted channels it gets to very nearly >> full >> speed quickly... nothing like the nice smooth curves you see in tidal >> tables >> or on the Internet web pages. >> >> I would have thought some geophysical science post-grad would be all gung >> ho >> about doing this sort of thing. > Dave Kruger wrote: > I believe NOAA set up current meters in selected channels and actually did > the measurements for a few, generated the algorithm which seemed to fit > best, and then extrapolated that to other areas where no actual > measurements were taken and called it good. Given other variables which > changed from day to day would throw the models off anyway, it probably was > not going to improve things much if they set up current meters in every > tidal channel. > > To be sure, the smooth curves are idealized results. But, the shape of > the curves is not the same for all channels; some are asymmetric; others > are symmetric. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed Oct 28 2009 - 08:31:18 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:38 PDT