Re: [Paddlewise] Following the money, Exxon Exposed

From: Mark Sanders <marksanders_at_sandmarks.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:12:10 -0800
Jim, are we skeptics really more set in our beliefs than those who believe 
in AGW? I agree with you that science is never settled, which makes it even 
more puzzling when we hear from people on the AGW side who dismiss us based 
on their seeming ultimate truth!
Despite our positions, I don't think Mike or I want to ignore the data, but 
the point may be moot according to this from the
TimesOnlineUK:

"SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing 
away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global 
warming are based."

Seems the scientists decided for us that the data was irrelevant!

Mark

----- Original Message ----- 

You have already made up your mind Mike. Why even consider data?

 Jim et al
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Tue Dec 01 2009 - 09:12:14 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:38 PDT