I should probably add that one couple was headed to Reno, Nevada, and the other was shooting for Maupin, Oregon. I believe both destinations are close to vast tracts of wilderness areas, which might be a factor in getting impractible winter routes out of their GPS units. I don't recall their points of origin. Brad Crain Quoting Craig Jungers <crjungers_at_gmail.com>: > On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Bradford R. Crain <crainb_at_pdx.edu> wrote: > >> >> I do not understand why the GPS units would recommend these people >> leave the safety of standard major highway routes and turn off into >> the National Forests on roads that aren't even maintained in winter. >> What's going on here? >> >> I have no less than seven GPS units but only two of them are specific for > highway use. Both of them offer several options for routing and as far as I > know all GPS units for highway use offer at least some variation of them: > > 1. Fastest route. This is generally a combination of freeways and major (US > or state) highways. No short cuts. It assumes - perhaps wrongly - that you > will get there faster on roads with higher speed limits. On my trip to > California it wanted me to go to Portland and down I-5 even though that > would be 120 miles further than taking US97 through Bend. I took US97 and it > finally figured it out. > 2. Major use of freeways. This will route you on freeways as much as > possible and then use major highways only if a freeway does not go to your > destination or very close to it even if you have to drive a long way out of > your way. > 3. Minimum use of freeways. This routes you via major highways and avoids > freeways whenever feasible. > 4. Shortest route. This gives you the absolute shortest route to your > destination without regard to what sorts of roads they are. They may be > county roads or even city arterials. The algorythm makes no allowances for > such things as mountain passes, narrow twisty roads, or weather problems. > Use this with caution. > > If a person is not sophisticated in the use of an automobile GPS they might > choose the last two methods thinking, erroneously, that if it's the shortest > then it must also be the quickest. > > Most industry pundits are now predicting the end of "stand alone" GPS units > such as the ones we now buy for our automobiles. They assume that > smartphones such as the iPhone or Blackberry - which do include GPS > capability - will supplant the single-purpose units. This may be so but the > smartphones will have to get a LOT better than the one I have (iPhone). The > screen is too small, the voice is too weak, and the GPS goes off if the > phone rings. I think that over the next few years stand-alone GPS units will > get a lot more sophisticated and will understand not to route people across > roads that are not maintained in the winter. These are probably available > now but not in the $100 range. > > I just finished a 2500 mile trip down and then back up the west coast with > freeways only for about half the way and I got to thinking that in some > places you really should have some clue where you are going as the GPS is > not always right. This is especially true if the unit is a year old (or > more) and not updated recently. It pays to have a map as a backup or, better > yet, some knowledge. Or even some pre-planning. Nahhhhh. > > So the short answer is that the GPS units aren't smart enough to know that > it's winter and/or the operators aren't smart enough to understand what > roads they should be on. > > > Craig Jungers > Moses Lake, WA > www.nwkayaking.net *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Jan 01 2010 - 15:46:05 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:38 PDT