PaddleWise by thread

From: MATT MARINER BROZE <marinerkayaks_at_msn.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Comparing sweeps chine and round hull - 'inertial' vs 'damped' responses
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 22:25:07 -0700
 PeterO wrote:
>
> On Saturday I was comparing two sea kayaks: a 5m round hulled Pittarak
> (similar to an Icefloe - http://www.pittarak.com.au/pittaraksingle.html)
vs.
> a 5m Tahe Greenland style kayak with a chined hull that extended either
side
> of the midsection along about half the length of the boat
> http://www.tahemarine.com/?module=Product&id=49. Neither boat has much
> rocker, they both rely on edging to make a sharp sweep turn. The links are
> given to show what they look like, I don't have any commercial interest in
> either.
>
> There were two differences in turning performance that puzzled me:
>
> 1. In conditions of low wind the Pittarak continues to turn for quite a
> while after a single sweep, provided I hold the edge, whereas the Tahe
> responded very precisely to the forward sweep stroke, only turning as the
> paddle moved almost as if it were damped, perhaps by turbulence or some
> other hydraulic resistance at the chined section of the hull?
>
> 2. The Tahe has a much shallower deck (and less knee room) with lower wind
> resistance so its ability to turn using a forward sweep on one side or the
> other was symmetrical i.e.. independent of orientation to the wind and
there
> was no need to consider reverse sweeps. On the other hand the fastest sweep
> (forward or reverse) to turn a Pittarak depends on its orientation to the
> wind and the direction in which the boat is being turned. I don't really
> understand why this should be but am told it's commonplace with boats that
> have high deck wind resistance.
>
> I'm not suggesting that one hull is 'better' than the other, but I'm
curious
> to understand the reasons for these different characteristics, their pro's
> and cons, and whether the first inertial vs. damped characteristic, can be
> generalised to most rounded hull vs. chined kayaks.


Nick responded:


>>>>A couple difference I would note on the two boats. Pittarak has a high
back deck and Tahe Greenland has a low back deck. When leaned to turn the high
deck will tend to lift the boat slightly and the low deck will allow the boat
to sink down. I notice with many Greenland style boats that the low back deck
will become awash with a relatively small amount of lean. When turning this
allows water to pile up on the back deck which will tend to slow down any
turn.<<<<<<<<<





Peter,

With just the title to go on earlier, I was expecting a question about how the
chines effected the relative tipping motions of the kayaks but that wasn't the
case. I agree with Nick that a back deck that gets water on it when leaned can
snag and stop the turn (and even cause a capsize, as happened to me the only
time I capsized a kayak during my lean to turn testing of over 1000 kayaks)
but I don't think that is what is happening here. I also don't think it is due
to the greater overall depth of the Pittarak kayak.  I think the difference
you noticed has nothing much to do with the difference in the chines but
rather the differences in the wind/water couple of the kayaks. The Pittarak
appears to have a tendence to weathercock when paddling forward in a sidewind
with no skeg (and the Tahe apparently doesn't). I'll bet if you drop the skeg
on the Pittarak you will find that it handles a lot more like the Tahe because
that will move the center of lateral resistance (due to the water) to the rear
and reduce the weatherhelm the wind/water balance was causing in the Pittarak.



The Pittarack would keep turning once the turn started (if not in a side wind)
because it was less directionally stable than the Tahe. The Tahe could be
stiffer tracking because it sits deeper in the water, is trimmed lower at the
stern, has more stern keel, has more vertical surfaces on the stern, is more
fishformed, or is narrower than the Pittarak (so doesn't have as much curve in
the stern quarter causing "lift" to the side at the stern to drive the
turn--this is also why a fish-form hull is more stable directionally--if all
other things are equal). It appears to me that the Tahe is achieving its
neutral balance when paddling forward in a sidewind by somehow increasing the
tracking stiffness. That tracking stiffness increase prevents the lean driven
turn from continuing once the turning force (from the paddle) is removed.



I wrote the above before looking at the links you provided. Now that I said
the above I looked up the relative dimensions of the two kayaks. It appears
rather than both being 5 meters as Peter wrote the Tahe Greenland is over a
foot longer (30.5cm) than the Pittarak and is about 4" (10cm) narrower as
well. From Sea Kayaker magazine's review of the Tahe Greenland I see it is
also slightly fish-form. I don't know anything about the center of buoyancy of
the Pittarak but given how wide it is I'll bet it has a lot more side curve in
the stern quarter that gives it more side "lift" when leaned to help keep it
turning on its own once a leaned turn has been started. The hard chine on the
Tahe also likely contributes to a more vertical side in the stern half that
helps prevent the stern from moving sideways as much. Being narrower the Tahe
probably sits a lot lower in the water and therefore has more keel in the
water at the stern. Also being narrower the keel won't be lifted nearly as
much from the water when the kayak is leaned as the with the wider Pittarak.
With more curve at the sides than the bottom, when you push the side down to
lean the kayak is lifted and has more rocker so it turns easier. The Pittarak
would probably do this lean turn with more precision were it hard chined in
the stern quarter to provide a curved keel when leaned that acts sort of like
a rudder. The more you lean it the tighter the turn should be with the
Pittarak.



I personally like a kayak that continues to turn when you lean it and I hate
fighting a constant tendency to weatherhelm (and also hate using rudders--and
to a lesser extent adjustable skegs to control weatherhelm). Getting both in a
kayak without a rudder or an adjustable skeg was a major design criteria for
us so your question was right up my alley, so to speak.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: PeterO <rebyl_kayak_at_energysustained.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Comparing sweeps chine and round hull - 'inertial' vs 'damped' responses
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:07:34 +1000
G'Day Matt and Nick and many thanks for the suggested explanations.

PeterO wrote:
>On Saturday I was comparing two sea kayaks: a 5m round hulled Pittarak
>(similar to an Icefloe - http://www.pittarak.com.au/pittaraksingle.html)
>vs. a 5m Tahe Greenland style kayak with a chined hull 

Nick responded:
>I notice with many Greenland style boats that the low back deck
>will become awash with a relatively small amount of lean. When turning this
>allows water to pile up on the back deck which will tend to slow down any
>turn.

Nick, Your explanation sounds plausible and I hadn't thought of it. I wasn't
looking at the rear deck but as you say it is very low, sufficient that I'm
able to lie right back on it, while I don't even come close to doing the
same with the Pittarak. I'll get someone to photo what's happening with the
deck the next time I'm in a Tahe Greenlander. 

Matt responded:
>I think the difference you noticed has nothing much to do with the
difference
>in the chines but rather the differences in the wind/water couple of the
kayaks.
>The Pittarak appears to have a tendency to weathercock when paddling
forward in
>a side wind with no skeg (and the Tahe apparently doesn't). I'll bet if you
drop
>the skeg on the Pittarak you will find that it handles a lot more like the
Tahe
>because that will move the centre of lateral resistance (due to the water)
to the
>rear and reduce the weatherhelm the wind/water balance was causing in the
Pittarak.

Matt there wasn't much wind but I noted your reply was before you saw the
length of the Tahe was 5.45m (I got it right in the first email and forgot
the decimal places in the second). Also as you say the Tahe is a narrower
boat, with significant areas of vertical hull surface, tracks well and turns
relatively easily but does have a well defined cessation of turning as soon
as the paddle stops moving. With the Pittarak, dropping the skeg does
reduces its tendency to keep turning after the sweep has stopped and makes
the boat somewhat harder to turn. Likewise as you say side winds have a
similar effect. 

Your subsequent analysis sounded consistent with what I'd observed,
particularly that the Tahe does sit deeper in the water, although the chined
hull changes to a rounded hull towards both the bow and stern. You're also
right that the Pittarak has a great deal of buoyancy near the cockpit, and
it reduces quite rapidly and symmetrically  towards both the bow and stern.
So on its side and when unloaded the rocker is considerable and this would
not be true for the Tahe. Next time I'm in a Tahe I'll try and get some
photos of it edged to see what exactly is happening at the bow, the stern
and the deck. BTW the Pittarak's 'side' rocker when edged might account for
its ability to respond relatively easily to the brace position to move from
a broach back into a break out or surfing stance.

Matt continued
>I personally like a kayak that continues to turn when you lean it and I
hate
>fighting a constant tendency to weatherhelm (and also hate using
rudders--and
>to a lesser extent adjustable skegs to control weatherhelm). Getting both
in a
>kayak without a rudder or an adjustable skeg was a major design criteria
for us...

When I read this it made me want to jump on the next plane and come over and
try a Mariner!

Something I'm still struggling to understand is why the Pittarak turns more
easily upwind with a reverse sweep and more easily downwind with a forward
sweep. The centre of rotation (if that's the right term) must be quite
different between the forward and reverse sweep. I've started trying to
develop an equation of motion treating the kayak as a single line with
points of contact at butt, knees and feet. One problem is how to make enough
realistic assumptions to reduce the variables. In particular how to
partition the forces between each point of contact and also to assign
realistic ranges of value to the relative angular velocities of the boat and
paddle with respect to the water. A friend commented I wouldn't get an
explanation with this approach as it was more likely to be related to wind
wave action but I find that just as hard to understand.


Nick and Matt. Thanks again and all the best, PeterO
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: MATT MARINER BROZE <marinerkayaks_at_msn.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Comparing sweeps chine and round hull - 'inertial' vs 'damped' responses
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:05:44 -0700
> From: rebyl_kayak_at_energysustained.com
> Something I'm still struggling to understand is why the Pittarak turns more
> easily upwind with a reverse sweep and more easily downwind with a forward
> sweep. The centre of rotation (if that's the right term) must be quite
> different between the forward and reverse sweep. I've started trying to
> develop an equation of motion treating the kayak as a single line with
> points of contact at butt, knees and feet. One problem is how to make
enough
> realistic assumptions to reduce the variables. In particular how to
> partition the forces between each point of contact and also to assign
> realistic ranges of value to the relative angular velocities of the boat
and
> paddle with respect to the water. A friend commented I wouldn't get an
> explanation with this approach as it was more likely to be related to wind
> wave action but I find that just as hard to understand.



You didn't say if this is when the Pittarak is starting from a standing
position or when it is moving forward. If when moving forward, try it again
when you are paddling backwards. I suspect it may now work the opposite way.
Also try this without any wind. Next try to separate the effects of the wind
and the waves. Maybe use boat wakes for no-wind waves and an offsore wind that
hasn't had enough fetch to build waves yet.



You also didn't say if you are leaning the kayak during these turns (if moving
forward). If so are you leaning them exactly the same? Or perhaps you are
leaning inside with the reverse sweep and to the outside with the forward
sweep? That will change things.



I think you can quit worrying about your points of contact with the kayak and
concentrate on the kayaks pivot point (which changes with speed due to the
resulting water pressure differential on the hull from front to back) and
where in the water the paddle blade is acting. You will also have to take into
account how your weight shift (to put the paddle blade where it is acting) may
be affecting your trim and what change that trim change will make to your
center of rotation. Leaning forward will move the center of rotation of the
hull forward and visa-versa.



If you give me a more detailed description of the conditions when you
experience this (and just how you make these turns) that addresses my
confusion I'll try to figure out what might be happening.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: PeterO <rebyl_kayak_at_energysustained.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Comparing sweeps chine and round hull - 'inertial' vs 'damped' responses
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:01:09 +1000
Thanks Matt,
 
Will run those variations and send you the results, I can say for sure is
that I lean forward and edge away from the turn when using a sweep and edge
into the turn when using a reverse sweep. I think I lean towards the stern
for a reverse sweep  and that the effect is similar whether turning on the
spot or moving forward, usually I'm turning on the spot when going upwind,
but its worth checking again.
 
I'll be down the south coast this weekend with 25 to 30 knot winds and 3m
swell forecast so will try to find a more sheltered spot otherwise might
have to be next weekend to try your suggestions.
 
All the  best, PeterO
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: MATT MARINER BROZE <marinerkayaks_at_msn.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Comparing sweeps chine and round hull - 'inertial' vs 'damped' responses
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:20:48 -0700
PeterO asked:

>>>>Something I'm still struggling to understand is why the Pittarak turns
more
easily upwind with a reverse sweep and more easily downwind with a forward
sweep. The centre of rotation (if that's the right term) must be quite
different between the forward and reverse sweep. <<<<<<



And when I asked, Peter clarified the way he leans for me:

>>>>>>....I can say for sure is that I lean forward and edge away from the
turn when using a sweep and edge into the turn when using a reverse sweep. I
think I lean towards the stern for a reverse sweep  and that the effect is
similar whether turning on the spot or moving forward, usually I'm turning on
the spot when going upwind, but its worth checking again....<<<<<<<





I'll bet, like most folks, when turning into the wind you are more comfortable
leaning/bracing more into the wind doing a reverse sweep than leaning downwind
to the outside doing a forward sweep/high brace. As I said earlier, the more
you lean the kayak the quicker it will turn. I suspect turning into the wind
you are willing to lean further to the inside (and into the wind) while low
bracing on a reverse sweep than you are willing do to the outside (leaning
downwind) doing a forward stroke. Turning downwind you are in the opposite
situation where you get to lean into the wind with the outside lean and must
lean downwind doing a reverse sweep. Since you naturally lean into a wind some
to compensate for the wind strength (to maintain balance) you aren't so far
off balance when leaning into the wind than when leaning at an equal angle
downwind.



With forward speed an outside lean with a forward stroke is most effective in
turning a wider kayak (and most kayaks) into a wind because maintaining speed
means you are being helped by the weathercocking tendency and for an equal
lean angle the stern keel will shed water better when the kayak is tilted to
the outside. You also gain the advantage of the side "lift" I talked about
earlier helping drive the turn.



Everybody should practice fast outside lean turns while maintaining good
bracing. The reason is that when the wind is strong you might still be able to
turn into it if you are willing to tilt the kayak away from the wind but might
not be able turn into the wind at all if you are afraid to tilt the kayak that
way. Practice this in strong winds when in a safe place. Being able to turn
into a stronger wind can be a real safety advantage. At speed, most sea kayaks
can turn nearly twice as fast with a good outside lean as they can with the
kayak level. I'm not making this up. When testing kayaks I time turns both
leaned and kept level, I do this comparison both when moving forward at
cruising speed and when spinning the kayak in place (in place the difference
is not as great but you can't normally turn a kayak into a strong wind as
easily in place as you can when getting some speed up accross the wind first
and just using forward sweep strokes). I have collected this data from most of
the 1000+ kayaks I tested on some spreadsheets (that include dimension data on
some 4000 one-person kayaks I know about--not including WW kayaks, surf skis,
wave skis, or downriver and flatwater racing kayaks).



In a strong wind with steep wind waves what happens is you make a turn into
the wind in the trough and then lose ground (water? angle?) when the bow rises
over the crest and is caught by the wind. The more angle you can gain in the
trough the more you can lose at the crest and stillhave made some progress by
the next trough. Turning speed is an important variable in this situation. The
length of the bow from the paddler (lever arm) and the windage at the bow are
some other variables that matter then as well. Weight in the bow (or the whole
kayak) is a big help and the weight and strength of the paddler are also big
helps when the wind is strong.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: PeterO <rebyl_kayak_at_energysustained.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Comparing sweeps chine and round hull - 'inertial' vs 'damped' responses
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:06:12 +1000
Some of the comments Matt made:
>SNIP I suspect turning into the wind you are willing to lean further to the

>inside (and into the wind) while low bracing on a reverse sweep than you
are
>willing do to the outside (leaning downwind) doing a forward stroke.
Turning 
>downwind you are in the opposite situation where you get to lean into the
wind 
>with the outside lean and must lean downwind doing a reverse sweep. Since
you 
>naturally lean into a wind some to compensate for the wind strength (to 
>maintain balance) you aren't so far off balance when leaning into the wind 
>than when leaning at an equal angle downwind.

>SNIP With forward speed an outside lean with a forward stroke is most
effective in
>turning a wider kayak (and most kayaks) into a wind because maintaining
speed
>means you are being helped by the weathercocking tendency and for an equal
>lean angle the stern keel will shed water better when the kayak is tilted
to
>the outside. You also gain the advantage of the side "lift" I talked about
>earlier helping drive the turn.

>SNIP Everybody should practice fast outside lean turns while maintaining
good
>bracing. The reason is that when the wind is strong you might still be able
to
>turn into it if you are willing to tilt the kayak away from the wind but
might
>not be able turn into the wind at all if you are afraid to tilt the kayak
that
>way. Practice this in strong winds when in a safe place. Being able to turn
>into a stronger wind can be a real safety advantage. At speed, most sea
kayaks
>can turn nearly twice as fast with a good outside lean as they can with the
>kayak level. 


G'Day,

Thanks Matt for the interesting post. Some of your points caught me by
surprise! Your point about the tendency to lean into or against the wind
sounds very likely though I have yet to check it. On Saturday the winds were
fluky, about 20-25knots blowing off shore with short period wind waves and
rebound. We had to stay near the cliffs so as not to be blown out to sea. So
very little wind sheltering behind cliffs and about 18knots surface wind
crossing bays near the beach and rounding points. I found it hard to
experiment and had to trust to reflex reactions. I'll try your suggestions
when it's about 15 knot surface wind with sub 1m waves, and/or long period
swell. 
 
I tested as much as I could in a sheltered spot. You're right about the
comfort factor comparing forward and reverse sweeps although it worked in
reverse for me and I was more hesitant with my port reverse sweep and very
comfortable with the forward sweeps. This is due to paddling with people who
are stronger and in faster, ruddered boats when I can't afford the drag
associated with reverse sweeps and practise forward sweeps often. Also I try
to focus on edging rather than leaning to get the hull further over (and
after years of being trashed in the surf).

When the Pittarak has very little load apart from my 70kg weight it goes
beyond its stable point with the cockpit rim edged to the water line and the
deck at about 45 degrees to the water surface. When using a forward sweep I
edge the cockpit rim about 1 cm below the water with some lift in the sweep
stroke. With a reverse sweep I edge the cockpit rim about 1cm above the
water line, i.e. a bit more hesitant! Larry Gray can take the Pittarak
almost to 90 degrees and seems to turn without any trouble at all in
conditions I'd find very challenging. He must be using a forward sweep with
a lot of lift, is that called a sculling sweep? I usually follow a forward
sweep with a slightly reduced edge, skimming the blade back across the water
in a low brace position trying not to touch the water but prepared to brace
if necessary. Likewise I return the reverse sweep by skimming the blade
forward above the water in a high brace position and with a slightly reduced
edge. In light winds and sea the Pittarak will turn on edge without any need
for a sweep stroke as per your weather cocking comment! All the sweep does
is make the turn faster. Taking advantage of this makes the boat a bit more
controllable in a following sea despite the weather cocking tendency,
otherwise in bigger following seas resorting to the skeg helps. 

Regarding your prediction on turning while moving. Its certainly less work
and a bit more stable than turning on the spot, as though the forward
movement is translating into a turning movement and contributing lift to the
forward sweep/scull stroke. So your comments about "weather cocking
tendency" and "side lift" seem to be right on the button. The comments on
safety were also useful, intrinsically and because sometimes I've found
paddlers not used to wind or following sea to be intimidated when turning
back. I'll remember your point when helping out, it will be a trade against
leaving them exposed for longer periods to beam seas and ease of turning in
a wide arc compared to on the spot. 

Thanks again - I'll provide some more pertinent feedback when I've tried
your suggestions and observations in wind.

All the best, PeterO
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:53 PDT