Richard wrote: >EPIRB use is not discouraged in Canada. >When a signal is made, the military sends a plane to drop a VHF to determine >what the emergency is, following which an appropriate rescue is preformed. Craig wrote: >I wonder if the Canadian fellow that PeterO wrote about wasn't thinking more of >the SPOT which has, indeed, created quite a ruckus several times. >And I wonder if the problems with the SPOT haven't settled down over the past >year or so now that people have had a chance to get used to them. Paul wrote >I may be being daft, but I can't see where the website description says it >transmits to the SAR satellite system (as a PLB or EPIRB does). G'day, Thanks Richard for the clarification and Craig for the potential explanation. My co-student did go on to describe the Spot system, which he seemed relatively happy with. If there were problems in the early days of SPOT and they were described by the media, then I can imagine the potential for confusion between SPOT and EPIRB operation, and that might be the reason for his concern. I'll take his opinion as just that and if he offers to sell me the CN Tower I'll probably decline:~) Paul, No you're not daft but I need better spectacles. They do say it uses VHF. So water activated and using VHF make two reasons it's not that suitable as an emergency beacon for kayakers. All the best, PeterO *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Feb 08 2011 - 14:00:23 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:44 PDT