PaddleWise by thread

From: skimmer <skimmer_at_enter.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] saved by WETSUIT !!!
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:56:03 -0500
He was in the water somewhat beyond his 1-10-1 time limit recommended by Dr.
Geisbrecht, the guy who studies clothing for snowmobilers out on the lake
ice, but who recommends just pfds for boaters! (because, according to Boot
Camp, the only clothing available for boaters is gummby survival suits or
float coats). The words of the diehard landsman that he is, which is clear
from his book on dressing for cold weather. 

 

http://www.fox59.com/news/wxin-kayaker-rescued-from-icy-lake-monroe-20110213
,0,6904372.story

 

Chuck Sutherland
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Craig Jungers <crjungers_at_gmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] saved by WETSUIT !!!
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:37:08 -0800
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:56 AM, skimmer <skimmer_at_enter.net> wrote:

> He was in the water somewhat beyond his 1-10-1 time limit
>

Despite calling for help almost immediately and the dive team arriving at a
launch spot a mile away it took over 2 hours to get him out of the water.
This guy would have been a dead duck if he hadn't been wearing a wet suit (I
presume "farmer john").

So... my question for people who claim that a PFD is the "best" way to
survive in cold water... do they think that wearing a drysuit or a FJ in
addition to a PFD is actually less safe?

Craig Jungers
Moses Lake, WA
www.nwkayaking.net
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <douglloyd_at_shaw.ca>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] saved by WETSUIT !!!
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:31:51 -0800
A PFD is your back-up buoyancy should you remain in the water for any length
of time. A human body is mostly water so weighs little when in the water.
Add a human's fat content (more for Mark) which has inherent buoyancy and
only a small amount of redundant buoyancy is needed to support a body in the
water. Around 30 pounds or a little more is reasonably sufficient in jumbly
water. 

Any PFD is better than no PFD; a PFD that provides adequate buoyancy in
steep sea states is even better (usually has inflatable buoyancy
compartments); a PFD that keeps the swimmer's head facing above-water if
unconsciousness ensues is best.

As equally important or correspondingly beneficial where there is more
chance of getting wet in cold water, a base layer of insulation and an
overlayer of raingear is better than just a shirt and shorts; a Farmer
John/Jane with paddling jacket or drysuit with a base layer reasonably
insulative enough is still better; a full-on survival suit probably best.
There's an overlap of buoyancy depending upon the combination worn. 

Performance athlete's face some tough (as do recreational sea kayakers on a
hot day on cold water) choices and as such had best to err on the side of
caution when approaching rough water, anticipating the possibility of
encountering rough water, or making for a long crossing or attempting
passages where gap winds could play havock. This sadly has not been the case
where performance paddlers end up in the water. There is always a lack of
prudence evident and a failure, one presumes, to anticipate the consequences
of a capsize. For routine training sessions, a chase boat should be
mandatory, or at least well considered. Where this is not practical, perhaps
routes should be revised. Perhaps a land-based activity is more appropriate
for those who can't comprehend cold-water dynamics. Where individuals or
groups of paddlers train in colder, jobbly waters with wind, such as surf
ski paddlers who do indeed challenge big water routinely, high-skill/superb
reboarding skills are a real necessity. 

There really is no good, better, best when it comes to cold water survival.
There are choices, adherences to safety norms, and compromises in gear
selection where performance requirements dictate certain practicalities. The
authorities recognize the importance of personal floatation devices, it may
overstate them in some cases, but the recognition is for both active boaters
(us) and inactive boaters (power boaters). Chuck understands the importance
of PFD's but feels there should be more awareness and official recognition
for cold water immersion protection. This is fair enough.

I doubt there will ever be regulations regarding immersion protection. There
might be a push in the next few years toward the mandatory wearing of PFD's
given the number of boating fatalities and the high cost associated with
these losses. Enforcement officers would certainly have an easier time as
they would instantly be able to see the PFD being worn or not (infraction)
as opposed to the time-consuming checking over of the vessel.  

I know first hand what it is like to suffer the loss of nerve conduction,
fine motor skills and the loss of appendage muscle contraction. The less
protection and the less buoyancy you have works quickly against you and in
real wind and waves it can be difficult to hang on to your boat as well as
difficult to facilitate corrective stroke action to avoid head and facial
water threats to breathing. A savvy paddler knows survival ultimately
equates to timely removal from the cold water environment, rather than
finding ways to increase thermal protection and retaining body heat.

I can't answer the question(s) raised lately. What is less safe? I can ask a
question: death from cold water immersion is a real possibility so are you
more safe wearing a PFD or immersion apparel? I'll take the PFD with good
buoyancy that minimizes my immersion and keeps my airway less susceptible
both during the initial cold shock period as well as later if self-rescue is
delayed and waves start to overwhelm during the fatigue phase;
correspondingly, reasonable immersion protection and head/hand protection
should allow functionality for timely self-rescue, help lessen cold-shock,
and mitigate against cascading failure during difficulties and delayed
rescue (by whatever means) from the cold water. 

Doug Lloyd

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:56 AM, skimmer <skimmer_at_enter.net> wrote:

> He was in the water somewhat beyond his 1-10-1 time limit
>

Despite calling for help almost immediately and the dive team arriving at a
launch spot a mile away it took over 2 hours to get him out of the water.
This guy would have been a dead duck if he hadn't been wearing a wet suit (I
presume "farmer john").

So... my question for people who claim that a PFD is the "best" way to
survive in cold water... do they think that wearing a drysuit or a FJ in
addition to a PFD is actually less safe?

Craig Jungers
Moses Lake, WA
www.nwkayaking.net
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Joe P. <jpylka_at_earthlink.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] saved by WETSUIT !!!
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:56:05 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
  A friend is a test engineer for Consumers Union and a few years ago they did a comparative study of PFDs, primarily the Type III designation -- what we paddlers normally wear.  
  He said that the buoyancy of these jackets was somewhat over 15 pounds, perhaps a bit more.  This level was selected for recreational activity to allow enough flotation to keep one's head and one arm above the water.  The former so you can breathe and see, the arm to wave with or grab ropes...
Joe P.


-----Original Message-----
>From: Doug Lloyd <douglloyd_at_shaw.ca>
>>A PFD is your back-up buoyancy should you remain in the water for any length
>of time. A human body is mostly water so weighs little when in the water.
>Add a human's fat content (more for Mark) which has inherent buoyancy and
>only a small amount of redundant buoyancy is needed to support a body in the
>water. Around 30 pounds or a little more is reasonably sufficient in jumbly
>water. 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <douglloyd_at_shaw.ca>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] saved by WETSUIT !!!
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:59:40 -0800
Joe,

For me, 10 pounds combined with my other gear would provide minimal flotation. 20 to 25 instant pounds with that same amount of drysuit floatation would be ideal. I think Kokatat have a hybrid model that would fit the bill, but too may "bills" for me right now.

Fully inflatable models do best but have reduces R values, trauma protection, and storage conveniences.

There are even times when I regret wearing any flotation but the memories of deep water disasters with airway difficulties moderates my attitude. 

Generally, I only consider and associate maximal buoyancy ideals with very, very cold winter paddling. Everything else is just fun. Deep temperature lows and rough water mean I'll be in my diver-modified drysuit and fully-inflatable Mustang vest (no connection to company).

For the bulk of recreational users, 15 pounds is fine, about what I generally prefer these days; however, my post was meant to add impetus to the desirability of paddlers choosing their gear with some thoughts about safety parameters (as opposed to hey, "this Kokatat Mango-coloured PFD matches my mango-coloured drysuit" (insert manufacturer of your preference).

Doug

Joe said:

  A friend is a test engineer for Consumers Union and a few years ago they did a comparative study of PFDs, primarily the Type III designation -- what we paddlers normally wear.  
  He said that the buoyancy of these jackets was somewhat over 15 pounds, perhaps a bit more.  This level was selected for recreational activity to allow enough flotation to keep one's head and one arm above the water.  The former so you can breathe and see, the arm to wave with or grab ropes...
Joe P.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Craig Jungers <crjungers_at_gmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] saved by WETSUIT !!!
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:30:22 -0800
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Doug Lloyd <douglloyd_at_shaw.ca> wrote:

> For me, 10 pounds combined with my other gear would provide minimal
> flotation. 20 to 25 instant pounds with that same amount of drysuit
> floatation would be ideal. I think Kokatat have a hybrid model that would
> fit the bill, but too may "bills" for me right now.
>
I have one of those Kokatat SeaO2 PFDs; in fact it's my second one... I
bought my first for only $99 at a kayak seminar in Tacoma and when that one
burned up in the shop fire I bought a second one (this time for $200!).

My feelings were (and still are) that you never know when you'll need that
extra flotation even if it's to help you roll up. With no air in the
chambers I believe the Kokatat is 13lbs of flotation which is probably
enough for calm water and a reasonably nice day. But inflated there is
something like 22lbs of flotation!

The other thing I liked about the Kokatat PFD is that it's minimal bulk when
you're paddling. Very little there to get in the way and it's extremely
comfortable.

If you do any paddling where you are likely to find yourself in rough water
(at the time I was spending a lot of time at Deception Pass) or would just
like minimal bulk in a PFD while getting maximum potential flotation then
the Kokatat is worth the money. It's not going to inflate if you are
incapacitated - which can be a drawback but seems to me to be a minor
consideration for sea kayakers.

The SeaO2 has an automatic inflation feature (pull the rip cord) but it also
has provision for inflation manually (which is all I've ever done).

Highly recommended despite the price.


Craig Jungers
Moses Lake, WA
www.nwkayaking.net
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Paul Hayward <pdh_at_mmcl.co.nz>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] saved by WETSUIT !!!
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:34:10 +1300
On Saturday, 19 February 2011 04:30
Craig said: 'minimal bulk in a PFD while getting maximum potential
flotation'

Thanks for the insights on the 2-way PFD.
My old multi-pocket unit is on its last legs (mine;-) and I'm thinking of a
2-way combined with an over-vest for pockets & tow system... anyone else
played with that idea ?

Best Regards
Paul Hayward, Auckland, New Zealand
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Joe P. <jpylka_at_earthlink.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] saved by WETSUIT !!!
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:18:30 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:54 PDT