PaddleWise by thread

From: Gary J. MacDonald <garyj_at_rogers.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] Effectiveness of PFDs
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 14:50:29 -0500
One piece of gear we all rely on, whether canoe or kayak paddlers, is the PFD.  
I am wondering what people think about the effectiveness--in the water of the 
models we have today.   Almost all kayak-influenced with big open shoulders for 
free movement, but with the flotation then moved a bit lower on the torso, and 
from what I can see more focused on the front and back.  In some ways they are 
more technically oriented, but when I think about replacement I wonder how they 
compare with my old hi-float which has more than 50% more flotation than 
required, although some of that is mounted high.

GaryJ
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <douglloyd_at_shaw.ca>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Effectiveness of PFDs
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 17:05:16 -0800
Some of the better rated models from well-respected makers I find very
uncomfortable. So, there are all kinds of performance parameters and design
orientations (like WW versus touring) but at the end of the day, you have to
be comfortable in the thing, it has to do the minimum flotation requirement,
and stay on well enough not to ride up while in the water. One of my older
hi-floats had good R value, seemed comfortable enough, though it rode high
while seated in the cockpit and didn't provide the real freedom of movement
I desired. I suppose it's all a matter of deciding which model gives you
comfort (so you will actually want to wear the cumbersome thing), freedom of
movement (important in WW paddling and for touring, you don't want
chaffing), and then get the flotation values you feel don't distract from
the first two. Buying one PFD for all seasons requires a bit of thought, but
if you paddle in really hot climates I be tempted to get one of the newer
venting PFDs. Most paddlers tend to go with units like the Kokatat ProFIT
Tour or similar PFD from the other big boys. I don't like the Ronin. Some
folks don't like the PFD's that go over the shoulders to put on either. 

As for flotation rates, seems like the more floatation the PFD has without
distributing it higher on the jacket, the more you will feel like the
Michelin Man, unless you go with a hybrid model with air chamber
augmentation. But boy, have PFDs come a very long way since I first started
paddling.

Doug

One piece of gear we all rely on, whether canoe or kayak paddlers, is the
PFD.  
I am wondering what people think about the effectiveness--in the water of
the 
models we have today.   Almost all kayak-influenced with big open shoulders
for 
free movement, but with the flotation then moved a bit lower on the torso,
and 
from what I can see more focused on the front and back.  In some ways they
are 
more technically oriented, but when I think about replacement I wonder how
they 
compare with my old hi-float which has more than 50% more flotation than 
required, although some of that is mounted high.

GaryJ
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gary J. MacDonald <garyj_at_rogers.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Effectiveness of PFDs
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:39:41 -0500
I agree on the issue of fit being king -- if you can't wear it and paddle all 
day then what good is it, really.

I used to notice the value of the extra flotation when tossed into the froth, 
but wonder if the newer models might re-locate the effective flotation instead 
of having some of it up around your ears.

Indeed thay have come a long way, and this is why I am considering a search for 
a new one while I still have older models that I like.

GaryJ


On 05/03/2011 8:05 PM, Doug Lloyd wrote:
> Some of the better rated models from well-respected makers I find very
> uncomfortable. So, there are all kinds of performance parameters and design
> orientations (like WW versus touring) but at the end of the day, you have to
> be comfortable in the thing, it has to do the minimum flotation requirement,
> and stay on well enough not to ride up while in the water. One of my older
> hi-floats had good R value, seemed comfortable enough, though it rode high
> while seated in the cockpit and didn't provide the real freedom of movement
> I desired. I suppose it's all a matter of deciding which model gives you
> comfort (so you will actually want to wear the cumbersome thing), freedom of
> movement (important in WW paddling and for touring, you don't want
> chaffing), and then get the flotation values you feel don't distract from
> the first two. Buying one PFD for all seasons requires a bit of thought, but
> if you paddle in really hot climates I be tempted to get one of the newer
> venting PFDs. Most paddlers tend to go with units like the Kokatat ProFIT
> Tour or similar PFD from the other big boys. I don't like the Ronin. Some
> folks don't like the PFD's that go over the shoulders to put on either.
>
> As for flotation rates, seems like the more floatation the PFD has without
> distributing it higher on the jacket, the more you will feel like the
> Michelin Man, unless you go with a hybrid model with air chamber
> augmentation. But boy, have PFDs come a very long way since I first started
> paddling.
>
> Doug
>
> One piece of gear we all rely on, whether canoe or kayak paddlers, is the
> PFD.
> I am wondering what people think about the effectiveness--in the water of
> the
> models we have today.   Almost all kayak-influenced with big open shoulders
> for
> free movement, but with the flotation then moved a bit lower on the torso,
> and
> from what I can see more focused on the front and back.  In some ways they
> are
> more technically oriented, but when I think about replacement I wonder how
> they
> compare with my old hi-float which has more than 50% more flotation than
> required, although some of that is mounted high.
>
> GaryJ
>
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3484 - Release Date: 03/05/11
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:54 PDT