My interest in the Canon S95 originally came from its f2.0 lens, but I see the XZ-1 beats that with a 1.8! Also it has a bigger sensor. I've read some head to head comparisons that put the S95 ahead or neck and neck. For me, price will be a factor. Did I read that the XZ-1 has a built in ND filter? That would be nice! Although the S95 is in a small body that I'd rather not use on land with my big hands, I figure it may make the WP case a little easier to deal with on the water. Your photos look great and close enough to DSLR for me! http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon_PowerShot_S95-vs-Olympus-XZ-1 Mark On 11/27/2011 3:26 AM, Tord S. Eriksson wrote: > Yeah, I do think the Olympus XZ-1 is close to a DSLR in picture quality > if not in absolute resolution! *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sun Nov 27 2011 - 07:16:48 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:46 PDT