PaddleWise by thread

From: Edward Sullivan 503-778-2429 FAX 778-2491 <SULLIVANED_at_kpnwoa.mts.kpnw.org>
subject: [Paddlewise] Pygmy Coho vs. Arctic Hawk
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 16:19:58 +0000 (GMT)
   Please compare and contrast. I want a light, fast, high performance 
   touring boat and was just about to get a Coho kit when a used Wilderness 
   Systems Arctic Hawk surfaced. Somebody warned me to watch out for flaws 
   in the Kevlar process in earlier boats (not W.S. boats specifically). 
   Any experience? 
   
   Comments on the performance of either, or building the Coho are 
   appreciated. 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Gordon S. Adams <gadams_at_socrates.berkeley.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Pygmy Coho vs. Arctic Hawk
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 11:13:48 -0700
At 04:19 PM 6/4/98 +0000, Edward Sullivan 503-778-2429 FAX 778-2491 wrote:
>   Please compare and contrast. I want a light, fast, high performance 
>   touring boat and was just about to get a Coho kit when a used Wilderness 
>   Systems Arctic Hawk surfaced. Somebody warned me to watch out for flaws 
>   in the Kevlar process in earlier boats (not W.S. boats specifically). 
>   Any experience? 
>   
>   Comments on the performance of either, or building the Coho are 
>   appreciated. 

I just returned from a trip to Baiya de Las Angeles on the sea of 
Cortes side of Baja.  The trip was the maiden voyage for my just 
completed Pygmy Coho.  I can't provide you with great perspective 
because the only boat that I've spent enough time in to compare it 
to is a rotomolded sea lion.  As it happened, the first day out was
windy, maybe 15-20 mph from the NE but no swell.  The coho handled 
the wind waves w/no problem and the small difficulty that I had in 
keeping it pointed on course could be attributed to simply getting 
used to a new boat.  Later in the afternoon, having finished snorkling 
at a couple of the islands and eaten lunch, the wind shifted and 
came howling out of the W,NW.  We were protected from the brunt of 
the wind by an adjacent island to the north of us and set out for 
the opposite shore.  When we came around the edge of the island and 
were met with a 40 mph wind and swells of 4 or 5 ft. it didn't take 
us long to turn tail and surf back to the north shore of Isle Vendata.
We spent the rest of the afternoon hiking around the island where 
the winds were hitting gail force up on the peaks.  We spent the 
night on the island -- had packed for it, but our night out was 
made more pleasant by the arrival of some mexican fishermen who 
gave us beer and let us sleep in their tent.

Oops, this boat review is turning into a trip report!

There was a lull the next morning and we crossed back to our camp 
in about 20-25 mph winds.  I did experience reverse weather cocking.
Or whatever the correct term is when the bow points downwind.  Could 
be that I had my load packed poorly but I didn't have that much weight 
in the boat.  The Coho did nicely in the waves with the bow slicing a 
little bit and then rising over the crest.  

Could be that a more skilled paddler would have had better luck 
keeping it on course.  My friend in his Necky was also struggling to 
keep on course.

During the rest of the trip the winds were much more moderate and the
boat handled beautifully.  Leaned turns were a cinch, primary and 
secondary stability seemed very good.  I did intentionally exit (with 
mask to look at some dolphins that were following us) and scrambled 
back in w/no problem).  (I am sufficiently uncoordinated that scrambling
back into a kayak is a good test of all types of stability!)

I am very pleased with the boat.  The only thing I would change would 
be the hatches.  I used the Pygmy kit and it works fine, minimal water 
entered the hatches (couple tablespoons) during a very wet paddle.  But 
the cinch cams that apply the pressure look like trouble if you involved 
in any rescue that involves someone laying/sliding accross either deck.

The construction went fine.  Took me a lot longer than the estimated time
but maybe that is just me.  There are some nice articles on better ways to
do the foot peddles and recessed deck lines at:
<http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/btreecs/HOME.htm>


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: K. Whilden <kwhilden_at_u.washington.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Pygmy Coho vs. Arctic Hawk
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 00:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Dear Edward,

I've paddled the Pygmy Coho only briefly on flatwater, but it was enought
to convince me that it is a remarkable boat. I've paddled a lot of boats,
and it is the first to earn such praise from me. Carves edged turns very
fast with no input from the paddle, but otherwise tracks well in
crosswinds. (Weathercocking is more pronounced on smooth water with 6-10
knots wind than rougher water with stronger winds.) Very nice secondary
stability and good speed. I sort of consider it a wooden version of the
Mariner II -- the Coho is a great full-blown expedition boat. I am
convinced that the Pygmy construction is at least as strong as all-glass
or kevlar.

The other nice things about this boat that really set it apart are the
looks, the weight, and the price. Varnished Mahogany is soooo beautiful,
40 lbs weight is really nice for carrying it around, and $700 is a great
price for the complete kit. Although, there are some extras, such as $85
for hatches and bulkheads, and $20 for deck rigging. Even so, it
is a great deal for a fantastic design.

Unfortunately, I have not paddled the Arctic Hawk, but I have seen it in
the store. It looks like a fun boat, but it definitely is limited on
storage space compared to the Coho. I would guess that the Artic Hawk
would be a little twitchier and perhaps a little more exciting in rough
water. The Coho will probably be a lot more forgiving to the non-expert
paddler. In the hands of the expert, I would guess that performance is
fairly similar. 

Sorry for all the guesswork. I have just taken delivery of my Pygmy Coho
kit, and I'll give a more complete breakdown of the Pygmy's handling in
really rough water once I have it built.

Cheers,
Kevin

ps. one nice thing about Pygmy is that they advocate using a sea sock with
their boats. Very smart in my opinion.... 

	 ___________________                                                            
	/   Kevin Whilden   \
       |Dept. of Geosciences \___
       |University of Washington \
       |kwhilden_at_u.washington.edu| 
        \________________________/                       

On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Edward Sullivan 503-778-2429 FAX 778-2491 wrote:

>    Please compare and contrast. I want a light, fast, high performance 
>    touring boat and was just about to get a Coho kit when a used Wilderness 
>    Systems Arctic Hawk surfaced. Somebody warned me to watch out for flaws 
>    in the Kevlar process in earlier boats (not W.S. boats specifically). 
>    Any experience? 
>    
>    Comments on the performance of either, or building the Coho are 
>    appreciated. 
> ***************************************************************************
> PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
> Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
> ***************************************************************************
> 

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Norm Strutin <nbsnbsn_at_ibm.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Pygmy Coho vs. Arctic Hawk
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 22:33:48 -0700
Kevin,

I was wondering if you have paddled and compared Pygmy's Osprey HP to
the Coho?  If so, what did you prefer about the Coho?

Norm

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Edward Sullivan 503-778-2429 FAX 778-2491 <SULLIVANED_at_kpnwoa.mts.kpnw.org>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Pygmy Coho vs. Arctic Hawk
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 16:44:55 +0000 (GMT)
   I have paddled the Coho and Osprey and probably couldn't distinguish 
   them blindfolded. Both handled delightfully. I'm getting the Coho based 
   on Pygmy's specs on wetted surface etc.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:32:50 PDT