Mind if I make an attempt at a more rigorous definition of some potentially confusing terms? ... oh goody.... Lets talk about efficiency for a moment. Loosely defined, efficiency means the ratio of power output over power input. Ealier, John Winters quoted some efficiency numbers, .92 for modern wind paddles, .86 for regular modern paddles. He didn't state the exact application of the these numbers, but I would hazard a guess that it means that for every 100 watts of paddler effort, 92 watts of are translated directly into forward motion of the boat (86% for regular paddles). The other 8 watts are lost due to turbulence, slippage of the paddle through the water, flexing of the paddle shaft, etc... Note the difference between the two kinds of paddles is not that great at six percent. However for racers, six percent is tremendous. For the average paddler, six percent is probably less important, although I will not call it insignificant. The efficiency contrast of the two paddles may be even smaller at recreational speeds. I have no idea where a greenland paddle would fall into an efficiency measurement, although I think another part of the benefit of greenland paddles for touring is that it facilitates the use of many different muscles all in the same day. I wonder if modern science can quantify that benefit. Ok, now lets talk about lift... but first lets talk about drag. The paddler is pulling backwards on the paddle (force vector points towards the stern). The resistance of the water (drag) on the paddle resists that pull (force vector points towards the bow). The drag force vector is slightly smaller than the paddler force vector, which is another way to think about efficiency. The difference in the size of the vectors represents the energy that is lost due to turbulence and the slippage of the paddle through the water. When lift is generated due to laminar flow, the size of the resistance vector is slightly increased because the lift vector points in the same direction as the drag vector. Even if further calculations were to show that the lift generated by Greenland paddles really is insignificant, efficiency is probably still increased because there is a lot less turbulence created by the laminar flow. And note, modern, non-wing paddles can significantly reduce turbulence by slicing the paddle outwards away from the kayak, just like racers and greenland paddlers. Well, the concepts above are quite clear to me, but I wonder how clear it is to the readers. I suppose I could put it down on a web page, with force vector diagrams, and with maybe even a bonus picture of me waving my hands. Anyhow, I hope my definitions make sense, and maybe clear up a little confusion. Cheers, Kevin ___________________ / Kevin Whilden \ |Dept. of Geosciences \___ |University of Washington \ |kwhilden_at_u.washington.edu| \________________________/ *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Jul 27 1998 - 00:31:14 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:58 PDT