PaddleWise by thread

From: Mark H. Hunt <mhh_at_aretha.jax.org>
subject: [Paddlewise] High School Physics Revisited
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 06:20:51 -0400 (EDT)
      Let's see....Take my mind back to high school physics 
class....hmmm....OK I'm there....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....ah refreshing. Thanks
                                                 mark
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: MAX <MAX_at_solomax.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] High School Physics Revisited
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 11:01:41 -0300
At 06:20 AM 24/07/98 -0400, Mark H. Hunt wrote:
>      Let's see....Take my mind back to high school physics 
>class....hmmm....OK I'm there....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....ah refreshing. Thanks
>                                                 mark

I haven't laughed so hard in a long time.  Thanx Mark! 

MAX

http://www.solomax.com

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk_at_gsp.org>
subject: [Paddlewise] OFF-TOPIC Re: High School Physics Revisited
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:35:53 -0400
On Fri, Jul 24, 1998 at 11:01:41AM -0300, MAX wrote:
> At 06:20 AM 24/07/98 -0400, Mark H. Hunt wrote:
> >      Let's see....Take my mind back to high school physics 
> >class....hmmm....OK I'm there....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....ah refreshing. Thanks
> 
> I haven't laughed so hard in a long time.  Thanx Mark! 

Y'know, I don't find this nearly as funny.  At least here in the US,
we now live in a society with an aversion to science.  Those who seek
to understand it are labeled as nerds and categorized as boring, while
pseudoscientic crap like UFOlogy and psychic power fascinates the masses.
As a consequence, even though we have incredible wealth and luxury
here, we also have a population that's astonishingly illiterate in
the basics of science (and mathematics).  The pity of it all is that
real science is far more beautiful and fascinating than any of the
lurid alternatives put forward by the fanatical, the greedy, and
the deceptive.

There are very real, profound, and dire consequences to this societal
ignorance, as Carl Sagan illustrates in his wonderful book,
"The Demon-Haunted World" -- which I strongly recommend to everyone.
It's very different from his other books ("Broca's Brain", "The Dragons
of Eden", 'Cosmos", etc.) and may be the best thing he's ever written.

---Rsk
Rich Kulawiec
rsk_at_gsp.org
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Mark H. Hunt <mhh_at_aretha.jax.org>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] OFF-TOPIC Re: High School Physics Revisited
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 11:52:38 -0400 (EDT)
Hey Rich,
         Lighten up!!  I earn my living in science.   I just had other 
things on my mind in highschool besides physics....
                                                        mark

On Fri, 24 Jul 1998, Rich Kulawiec wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 24, 1998 at 11:01:41AM -0300, MAX wrote:
> > At 06:20 AM 24/07/98 -0400, Mark H. Hunt wrote:
> > >      Let's see....Take my mind back to high school physics 
> > >class....hmmm....OK I'm there....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....ah refreshing. Thanks
> > 
> > I haven't laughed so hard in a long time.  Thanx Mark! 
> 
> Y'know, I don't find this nearly as funny.  At least here in the US,
> we now live in a society with an aversion to science.  Those who seek
> to understand it are labeled as nerds and categorized as boring, while
> pseudoscientic crap like UFOlogy and psychic power fascinates the masses.
> As a consequence, even though we have incredible wealth and luxury
> here, we also have a population that's astonishingly illiterate in
> the basics of science (and mathematics).  The pity of it all is that
> real science is far more beautiful and fascinating than any of the
> lurid alternatives put forward by the fanatical, the greedy, and
> the deceptive.
> 
> There are very real, profound, and dire consequences to this societal
> ignorance, as Carl Sagan illustrates in his wonderful book,
> "The Demon-Haunted World" -- which I strongly recommend to everyone.
> It's very different from his other books ("Broca's Brain", "The Dragons
> of Eden", 'Cosmos", etc.) and may be the best thing he's ever written.
> 
> ---Rsk
> Rich Kulawiec
> rsk_at_gsp.org
> ***************************************************************************
> PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
> Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
> ***************************************************************************
> 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: MAX <MAX_at_solomax.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] OFF-TOPIC Re: High School Physics Revisited
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:51:41 -0500
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jul 24, 1998 at 11:01:41AM -0300, MAX wrote:
> > At 06:20 AM 24/07/98 -0400, Mark H. Hunt wrote:
> > >      Let's see....Take my mind back to high school physics
> > >class....hmmm....OK I'm there....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....ah refreshing. Thanks
> >
> > I haven't laughed so hard in a long time.  Thanx Mark!
> 
> Y'know, I don't find this nearly as funny.  At least here in the US,
> we now live in a society with an aversion to science.  

I apologize. I really do enjoy the high level of intelligent
conversation on this newsgroup.  I just liked the way how Mark expressed
his view. I thought it was humorous - a nice break from the intellectual
stimulus. It was like a kid making a wise crack from the back of the
class. I'm sure I am not the only one who got a chuckle out of it. Who
knows... maybe I was. I'm probably the least "mature" of anyone on this
newsgroup. 

MAX

http://www.solomax.com - a 4 year kayak journey
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Fenton <jackie_at_intelenet.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] OFF-TOPIC Re: High School Physics Revisited
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
>
> From: MAX <MAX_at_solomax.com>> 
> Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 1998 at 11:01:41AM -0300, MAX wrote:
> > > At 06:20 AM 24/07/98 -0400, Mark H. Hunt wrote:
> > > >      Let's see....Take my mind back to high school physics
> > > >class....hmmm....OK I'm there....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....ah refreshing. Thanks
> > >
> > > I haven't laughed so hard in a long time.  Thanx Mark!
> > 
> > Y'know, I don't find this nearly as funny.  At least here in the US,
> > we now live in a society with an aversion to science.  
>
>
> I apologize. I really do enjoy the high level of intelligent
> conversation on this newsgroup.  I just liked the way how Mark expressed
> his view. I thought it was humorous - a nice break from the intellectual
> stimulus. It was like a kid making a wise crack from the back of the
> class. I'm sure I am not the only one who got a chuckle out of it. Who
> knows... maybe I was. I'm probably the least "mature" of anyone on this
> newsgroup. 
> 
> MAX


Nahhhhhh.... *I'm* the least mature of anyone here! :-p

I thought it was funny as well as a relief.  I disagree with the 
statement that "we now live in a society with an aversion to science" 
and have seen no evidence to support that we are less interested in 
science today than in the past.  I see more science related programs 
on TV now than ever before and entire news segments devoted to science 
and discovery (and it's not just PBS).  Participation in school science 
competitions are nationwide and fun for kids.  Science museums requiring
hefty donations from the public have been constructed, many with areas
devoted especially to children as their audience (I've stood in lines
to get into science museums).  I don't have kids but I see an awful 
*lot* of interest in and fascination with science in the children of 
friends of mine.   Much of the pseudoscience is regarded by the public 
as simply entertainment and recreation (afterall, more newspapers have 
moved the horoscope section to the entertainment section with 
disclaimers).  Why, Psychic Friends Network even went bankrupt! 
(wonder if Dion saw *that* coming :-)  I think the fact that we are 
aware of pseudoscience indicates progress.   Debunking is popular and 
interesting.  My crowd does not see science or scientists as "boring" 
and "nerds"... as long as the scientists maintain a sense of humor...
or look like Mel Gibson :-)  

Cheers,

Jackie
                                 _                        _   _
       _   _                     \\                      / \0/ \
      / \0/ \                     \\                        "
         "                         `\         
                               ,sSSs,\,      
                  )\w/(       ,sSS..)/{)    
                  <<..>       sSSS_v)/ \   
                   )<*>      sSS[(\_]___\
               <(_/_o_o_     'sS[_`-+---+)  
           \----+-------+-------'---`-----\-------------')
 ~~~~~~~ ~~jf ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~\~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
        o                                   \
              o                             \\     o      o
                                             \\  o
           o                                  `
                 (\                                o
          o   >jf:-)       o
                 (/                               o

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk_at_gsp.org>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] OFF-TOPIC Re: High School Physics Revisited
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 19:29:32 -0400
On Fri, Jul 24, 1998 at 01:34:58PM -0700, Jackie Fenton wrote:
> I thought it was funny as well as a relief.  I disagree with the 
> statement that "we now live in a society with an aversion to science" 
> and have seen no evidence to support that we are less interested in 
> science today than in the past.  

My experience has been just about the opposite: that there is a strong
current of anti-intellectualism that not only encompasses science,
but literature, art, music, history, and just about every other field
of inquiry.  Many of those who simply want to understand the universe
(or the world, or themselves, or a work of art) are labeled as
elitist snobs or ivory-tower academics or other epithets which say
more about the ignorance of those using them than about the character
of those they're applied to.

While you're right about science being popular in some contexts (e.g.
the amazing surge of interest in dinosaurs), I'm not sure that's *real*.
It didn't happen because of the controversy over whether or not
dinosaurs were warm-blooded (c.f. Robert Bakker's excellent book,
"The Dinosaur Heresies"), an incredibly fascinating debate; it happened
because Hollywood made a movie about it.  I find this very disappointing --
the real debate is far more fascinating than the fantasy.  (This is
happening again: thanks to Hollywood, the study of asteroids is
now receiving some press -- nevermind that the debate over the
iridium layer in the K-T boundary and its relationship to a possible
large impact 65 million years ago has been ongoing for years.)

Again, I strongly recommend Sagan's book ("The Demon-Haunted World"),
as he expresses these concerns far more eloquently than I can.

---Rsk
Rich Kulawiec
rsk_at_gsp.org
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Fenton <jackie_at_intelenet.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] OFF-TOPIC Re: High School Physics Revisited
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 19:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
> From rsk_at_gsp.org Sun Jul 26 16:33 PDT 1998
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 1998 at 01:34:58PM -0700, Jackie Fenton wrote:
> > I thought it was funny as well as a relief.  I disagree with the 
> > statement that "we now live in a society with an aversion to science" 
> > and have seen no evidence to support that we are less interested in 
> > science today than in the past.  
> 
> My experience has been just about the opposite: that there is a strong
> current of anti-intellectualism that not only encompasses science,
> but literature, art, music, history, and just about every other field
> of inquiry.  

I disagree that this represents American society in general as you 
stated in your original statement.

> Many of those who simply want to understand the universe
> (or the world, or themselves, or a work of art) are labeled as
> elitist snobs or ivory-tower academics or other epithets which say
> more about the ignorance of those using them than about the character
> of those they're applied to.

Not my experience (different crowd, I guess). I have found excitement 
and wonder in discovery to be contagious and very stimulating in both 
sciences and arts.  I especially get a kick out of watching kids 
discover and hope I'm never too old to enjoy something new myself :-)   
A talented, enthusiastic and positive teacher generally finds his/her 
audience (kids or not) willing participants.  Abrasive and patronizing 
lecturers are bores and will almost always find dull students.
 
> While you're right about science being popular in some contexts (e.g.
> the amazing surge of interest in dinosaurs), I'm not sure that's *real*.

????  Well, either there *is* or there *isn't* an interest in science.
Which is it?  How can you know for others whether their interest
is real or not?  If you aren't sure, then why label the whole of 
American society as disinterested?

If society were disinterested in science, why would pseudoscience
find it necessary to steal from the language of science in an attempt
to gain credibility?

> It didn't happen because of the controversy over whether or not
> dinosaurs were warm-blooded (c.f. Robert Bakker's excellent book,
> "The Dinosaur Heresies"), an incredibly fascinating debate; it happened
> because Hollywood made a movie about it.  I find this very disappointing --

hmmm..... 

> the real debate is far more fascinating than the fantasy.  (This is
> happening again: thanks to Hollywood, the study of asteroids is
> now receiving some press -- nevermind that the debate over the
> iridium layer in the K-T boundary and its relationship to a possible
> large impact 65 million years ago has been ongoing for years.)

There was a tremendous amount of interest last summer when the Mars 
Pathfinder's Sojourner explored the surface of Mars.  A lot of 
websites have been devoted to the exploration.  I'd rather not decide 
for these volunteers and those of the thousands of other sites devoted 
to science that their interest isn't "real."  There has been 
fascination with the sky and sciences long before Hollywood, represtented 
voluminously in literature and art (or is this invalid representation 
because art and literature can also be considered entertainment?).  
Because there is a new medium that draws on the fascination doesn't 
mean the fascination is less real.  Hollywood prefers to hedge its 
bets and know the interest will be there *before* they shell out the 
bucks for the project. 

> Again, I strongly recommend Sagan's book ("The Demon-Haunted World"),
> as he expresses these concerns far more eloquently than I can.

I'm familiar with Sagan's work and I can't recall, personally, anyone
ever calling him a nerd, dork, or boring.  Whadda guy!  He will be
missed.

We'll just have to say we see things differently.  This has probably 
strayed too far off-topic so this is my final post on the subject to 
the list, position unaltered.

Cheers,

Jackie 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Bob Washburn <whiterabbit_at_iw.edwpub.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] High School Physics Revisited
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:11:14 -0500
You obviously were not sitting in the back of the room trading notes with
Sally Ferguson ;)

Not to stray too far off topic but I do agree with Rich that the ignorance
of science and math among decision makers is worrysome.  I've had to
correct high school science teachers on basic principles, no wonder psuedo
science is so prevalent.

At 06:20 AM 7/24/98 -0400, Mark H. Hunt wrote:
>      Let's see....Take my mind back to high school physics 
>class....hmmm....OK I'm there....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....ah refreshing. Thanks
>  
                        ,,,
                      (o o)
==================oOO--(_)--OOo==========================
                  Bob Washburn
whiterabbit_at_iw.edwpub.com  or   rwashbu_at_siue.edu
The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth.
=========================================================
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:32:50 PDT