[Paddlewise] why or why not bulkheads?

From: Chuck Holst <CHUCK_at_multitech.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 15:42:00 -0500
>>
Though I use a boat with bulkheads, I supplement the floatation with
dry/float bags in the bow and stern compartments. I had heard that in   some
extreme circumstances, bulkheads can act as a "stress riser" which   actually
weakens the deck or hull if it's being pounded or bent. However, I heard
this from a maker of non-bulkheaded (but "sea-socked") boats. Besides, I
suspect that very very few of us kayak in the sorts of extremes where   this
would matter. I'd welcome comments, especially from those of a "Wintery"
persuasion.

Cheers

Philip
>>

*************************************************************************

FWIW, at the last Great Lakes Sea Kayak Symposium, Sam Cook, a member
of the unsupported 500-mile Nordkapp expedition of 1975, said that Frank
Goodman was reluctant to put bulkheads into the Nordkapp kayak for this
very reason (up till then no British kayaks had bulkheads). But during
preparations for the Nordkapp expedition, the expedition members found
swamped kayaks without bulkheads to be very difficult to rescue, so
they insisted that the expedition kayaks have bulkheads, watertight
hatches, and built-in pumps. Cook had some very interesting slides
showing different methods of sealing the hatches that they tried.

I think most British kayaks since then have had bulkheads.

Chuck Holst  
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu Oct 08 1998 - 13:44:21 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:00 PDT