PaddleWise by thread

From: BRADFORD R. CRAIN <brad_at_mth.pdx.edu>
subject: [Paddlewise] legs & fiberglass
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 11:27:05 +0000
     When I first started seakayaking, I found the tight quarters
very confining. The hard fiberglass seat was tough on my back
and derriere. After a few  hours of paddling, I was ready to bail out.
     Now I always place something under my knees, and the legs 
last much longer. My back seems to have adjusted to the seat. I also
try to move my legs and back periodically, to get a little relief.
********************************************************
     Now for the other topic. We have had numerous comments
concerning how long a plastic kayak will last. But my craft is 
fiberglass, so naturally one wonders-how long can you expect a
fiberglass kayak to last? In other words, if X=lifetime, what is
the mean and variance of X, and what is the family of probability
distributions for X? Finally, what are the covariates of X?
********************************************************
**********************************************************************
Bradford R. Crain                             E-mail: brad_at_mth.pdx.edu
Dept. of Mathematics                          Phone: (503) 725-3127
Portland State Univ.                          FAX:   (503) 725-3661  
P.O. Box 751
Portland, Or. 97207
**********************************************************************
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Alex Ferguson <a.ferguson_at_chem.canterbury.ac.nz>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] & fiberglass
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 1998 11:00:48 +0000
>      Now for the other topic. We have had numerous comments
> concerning how long a plastic kayak will last. But my craft is 
> fiberglass, so naturally one wonders-how long can you expect a
> fiberglass kayak to last?

I know of one yacht, on a mooring, 35+ years old.

Your glass kayak could outlast you.

Alex
--
----------------------------------------------------
Alex Ferguson      a.ferguson_at_chem.canterbury.ac.nz
Electronics Workshop, Chem Dept, Univ of Canterbury
Christchurch, New Zealand
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <Bhansen97_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] & fiberglass
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 11:02:50 EST
Years ago, my kevlar Whitewater II canoe gradually faded into history as a
result of  - something. I've always thought it was UV exposure, since the
canoe was stored outside and without a cover, 3 seasons of the year. But maybe
it was something else.

Now whenever I think of that canoe I think of Gene Jensen. Hope things go
better for him (with his recent stroke) than would be expected...    - Bill
Hansen
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <735769_at_ican.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] & fiberglass
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 07:31:06 -0500
Hank wrote;

>
>I've never seen that, Bob, and I've used Kevlar in boats and paddles for
>over 25 years.

 (SNIP)

I have seen boats from four different major manufacturers that degraded to
the point where the finger test failed. In defence of the manufacturers all
of the boats were built during the days before Vinyl ester resins. So, the
resins used were probably Isopthalics at best or orthopthalics at worst,

The failure (Steve Freund can correct me on this if I am wrong) is due to
the absence of UV stabilisers in the resin. In my day UV stabilisers had a
purple color and people didn't like the look of them.

Hank's experience not withstanding  clear resins do not appear to perform
as well as pigmented resins.

Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
http://home.ican.net/~735769/



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Williams <dave_at_seacanoe.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] & fiberglass
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 08:32:44 +0700
Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] & fiberglass

John Winters wrote:
 (SNIP)
I have seen boats from four different major manufacturers that degraded to
the point where the finger test failed. In defence of the manufacturers all
of the boats were built during the days before Vinyl ester resins. So, the
resins used were probably Isopthalics at best or orthopthalics at worst.

What does "isopthalics" mean?

What does "orthopthalics" mean?

They ain't in any of my dictionaries!

Thanks,
Dave


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <dkruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] & fiberglass
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 19:55:14 -0800
Dave Williams wrote:
> 
> John Winters wrote:
>  (SNIP)
> I have seen boats from four different major manufacturers that degraded to
> the point where the finger test failed. In defence of the manufacturers all
> of the boats were built during the days before Vinyl ester resins. So, the
> resins used were probably Isophthalics at best or orthophthalics at worst.
> 
> What does "isophthalics" mean?
> 
> What does "orthophthalics" mean?
[snip]
These are different isomers of phthalic acid -- the benzene-based
dicarboxylic acid which forms part of the backbone of a
phthalate-ester-based polymer.  Isomers are molecules having the same
atomic composition but a different arrangement of the atoms.  In practical
terms, I suspect the phthalate ester-based polymers were more susceptible
to early embrittling, and were not as tough as the vinylester-based
polymers.

Your dictionary may have them listed the way I have spelled them.

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
chemist
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Hank Hays <lhays_at_canby.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] & fiberglass
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 08:11:01 -0800
>Dave Williams wrote:
>> What does "isophthalics" mean?
>> 
>> What does "orthophthalics" mean?

Dave Kruger gave us the chemistry side.  What it means to us mere mortal
paddler types is that isophthalic polyester is stronger (and more
expensive) than orthophthalic resin.  I think there is more crosslinking
between the molecules in iso than with ortho.  Could be some other
characteristics are better also, but Dave K would be the guy to quiz about
that <grin>.  Vinylester is even better yet (and more expensive still) and
some epoxies are the best (and often *lots* more expensive.  Iso is a bit
newer than ortho and vinylester is newer still.  Epoxy has been around for
quite a while, too, but  many of the newer ones are better than the old
originals.  

Hank Hays
Lightning Paddles 

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <dkruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] fiberglass [edging toward off topic]
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 10:08:06 -0800
Hank Hays wrote:
> 
> >Dave Williams wrote:
> >> What does "isophthalics" mean?
> >>
> >> What does "orthophthalics" mean?
> 
> [snip} ... isophthalic polyester is stronger (and more
> expensive) than orthophthalic resin.  I think there is more crosslinking
> between the molecules in iso than with ortho.  Could be some other
> characteristics are better also, but Dave K would be the guy to quiz about
> that <grin>.  Vinylester is even better yet (and more expensive still) and
> some epoxies are the best (and often *lots* more expensive.  Iso is a bit
> newer than ortho and vinylester is newer still.  Epoxy has been around for
> quite a while, too, but  many of the newer ones are better than the old
> originals.

To round out Hank's summary, here is a little more information.  Extracted
from this commercial boat-building site, which also touches on other resin
issues:  http://www.duroplastic.com/art_bbfg.html  

Actually, Hank has a lot of this same information on his business's Web
site, IIRC (http://www.paddles.com/index.html).

--BEGIN:		RESIN TYPES   

  There is a choice of resins too, on a rising scale of cost and
performance, orthophthalic polyester being the cheapest and
  easiest to use. (Incidentally, it is not the resin that gives a freshly
moulded boat its characteristic smell, but the styrene
  solvent.) Next comes isophthalic polyester, 50% more expensive, but more
resilient and with better resistance to water (see
  under "Blistering". Then there's vinylester, stronger and more water
resistant still, but more than double the price of
  ortho-polyester. All three behave in the same way chemically, and begin
to cure following the addition of a tiny amount
  (1-2%) of a catalyst to start the polymerisation process. And finally
there's epoxy, five times the price of ortho-polyester but
  far superior in every other respect, notably in its resistance to water
degradation as well as in its adhesive strength. Instead
  of a catalyst, epoxy requires a large proportion of hardener to start the
reaction (from 20% to as much as 50%, depending
  on the particular product) and this hardener forms part of the final
polymer. The use of epoxy allows composites to be
  produced with very high fibre-to-resin ratios making them much stronger
and lighter than is possible with the other resins,
  but it is still too costly to be considered as a universal replacement
for them. 
--END

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:32:54 PDT