I agree that the *type* of kayak should be a *consideration* but one can roll a Gannet especially if one puts some thigh hooks and foam bracing in it to make it fit. I find the ability to transfer body movements efficiently to the hull to be more important than the hull shape. Eric -----Original Message----- From: Robert Woodard [mailto:woodardr_at_tidalwave.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 1999 1:34 PM To: Paddlewise Subject: [Paddlewise] Roll that Yak! Ummm. if you can. I've been reading the paddle float vs. roll discussion with great interest. Mainly because I'm at the point I want to learn how to roll. But as I sat here reading these posts I started to think about my "other" kayak - A Necky Gannet I bought for the kids. This is a very wide recreational kayak with a cockpit so big and a beam so wide I doubt very seriously I would ever be able to roll it. A couple of inferences to the klepper being a beast to roll has me thinking: In the roll vs paddle float debate, shouldn't the "type" of kayak also be a (prime) consideration? Or is the width (or any other dimension) not a factor is rolling? Thanks in advance, Woody *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed May 12 1999 - 14:23:34 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:08 PDT