At 10:34 AM 11/4/99 -0600, Chuck Holst wrote: > >Considering the large number of novice sea kayakers going out in the >Apostles after only a few hours of instruction, I am amazed that there >have not been any deaths in the area. Either the sport is not as >inherently dangerous as we think (at least, not in a non-tidal area such >as Lake Superior), or the amount of skill and instruction required to >sharply reduce deaths is much lower than often appears. > One of the difficulties that we have had with this discussion is that the degree of risk varies so much from place to place and from time to time, so you can't take blanket measures that are appropriate for all circumstances. As a for-instance: we're talking an inland lake, about 600 acres. Water temp is in the high fifties, air temp is in the seventies. Not enough wind to try out my new sailboat, and a leisurely paddle on flat water with another moderately skilled paddler. In spite of the marginal water temp, is it reasonable to skip the wet suit? I was glad I did Sunday; before it was over with, I'd peeled down to a t-shirt. It got warm out there. OK, Monday a front comes through. It's the same lake, the water temp is about the same, but the air temp is about 40, it's blowing 25-30 MPH, with rain and snow, the waves are about as big as you'll ever see on an inland lake, and, since it's a week day, I'd have to be solo and going out just before sunset. Should I wear a wet suit? No, because I'm not going out in those conditions. The risk level -- and, for that matter, the discomfort level -- is too high. I immensely respect people like Doug Lloyd, storm paddling, in a Nordkapp, no less, miles from anywhere, solo, cold water, a huge element of risk -- but equipped and trained for it as well as he can be. Would I accept that level of risk? No. Since I have a far more benign risk threshold, do I need the same level of equipment, training and experience? I don't think so, although clearly I do need some fraction of it. The threshold of risk that each individual will accept has to be the decision of that individual. That decision needs to be made conservatively and wisely, and based on one's experience, training, equipment, and better judgement. How do I acquire all this? It's not a straightforward answer -- it comes piece by piece, with some mistakes made along the way. While training gives some depth to the process of making a decision, it cannot by itself be the basis for decision. Theoretical knowledge needs to be tempered by real world experience, or it won't be real. You have to give people some credit for common sense. If you don't, they will resent blanket rules. -- Wes *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Nov 04 1999 - 09:53:47 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:16 PDT