There has been interesting discussion recently about durability, especially as it pertains to the NDK Romany. While I think the Romany 16 is a fine boat, I feel that it is much heavier than a 16 foot kayak needs to be. This seems true of most of the British boats. NDK and Valley Canoe do not seem to use the vacuum bagging tehniques that are common practice in North America. Also,the decks of the Brit boats seem to be laid up with a heavy fiberglas matte which must take a lot of resin to wet out. This certainly does make for a stiff deck but the added weight factor must be significant. I wonder if rigidity equates with strength in a boat as small as a sea kayak that travels at such minimal speeds? Are British boats stronger or are they just resin-heavy? My own priorities are skewed with a bias toward light weight. My Arctic Hawk weighs 46 pounds [floatation bags, no bulkheads or hatches] and, in four years of actively paddling this boat, I've not experienced any hull or deck failures. I do not surf the Hawk because the design is not suitable for that kind of use and I would not use a fiberglass boat in those kinds of hydrokinetics. That is a great place for plastic. I've also noticed that after a lengthy paddle, all kayaks seem to gain weight. On a favorite 16 mile trip, for instance, my Hawk seem to gain about 10 or 12 pounds which makes carrying it back to the car something of a chore. This is another reason I prefer a light boat. Has anyone out there experienced hull failure in a fiberglass or composite boat that could be attributed to an overly light layup? What boat and under what conditions did it fail? John *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed Jan 05 2000 - 09:35:51 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:18 PDT