Re: [Paddlewise] Durability

From: Michael Daly <michaeldaly_at_home.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 14:20:53 -0500
John Myers wrote:

> NDK and Valley Canoe do not seem to
> use the vacuum bagging techniques that are common practice in North America.

This I can't understand.  Are vacuum bagging techniques significantly more
expensive?  The advantages, to me, outweigh any disadvantages I know of.

> Also,the decks of the Brit boats seem to be laid up with a heavy fiberglas
> matte which must take a lot of resin to wet out. This certainly does make
> for a stiff deck but the added weight factor must be significant. I wonder
> if rigidity equates with strength in a boat as small as a sea kayak that
> travels at such minimal speeds?

I learned about boat design from a naval architect friend who taught me to
sail back in the '70s.  He left me with the impression that glass mat construction
is for the cheapest boats and "real designers" use woven glass cloth.  I just
double checked Walbridge's Boatbuilder's Manual and he says that mat's good
for bathtubs but not recommended for boats.

One advantage of mat is that the resulting material is closer to isotropic - that
is, the material properties are the same in all directions.  Woven cloth is stiff
and strong in two directions (along the length of the threads) but less so at
angles to the thread.  I've heard of folks laying multiple layers of woven glass
cloth at angles to each other to reduce this problem, but my guess is that is
not significant in kayaks.  John, Matt or others may have more insight.


> Are British boats stronger or are they just resin-heavy?

If anyone wants to volunteer their boats, I can supervise the testing.
I've broken more than a few big steel beams in university research.
Fiberglass and kevlar should be easy!

> Has anyone out there experienced hull failure
> in a fiberglass or composite boat that could be attributed to an overly
> light layup? What boat and under what conditions did it fail?

It's not easy to compare realistically the strengths of kayaks that have
failed under different conditions.  Anecdotal evidence tells us less than
an instrumented kayak.  Also, there are other details besides the shell
construction.  The bulkheads, coamings, hatches and other details
contribute to the overall strength and stiffness, so you'd have to compare
different versions of the same boat.  Make a Romany Explorer using the
best vacuum bagging techniques and good woven cloth then compare it
to a Brit built battleship version.  That'd tell us.

Mike

PS - Anyone care to corner Nigel Dennis or other British designer/builders
at a symposium and put the question to them?

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Wed Jan 05 2000 - 11:22:21 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:18 PDT