> Kayaks have very little in common with cars. Do you group them together > because they're both vehicles? Because we sit in them both? Again the > details of your argument are coherent, in that limited scope, but the premise > is way off. I chose cars because they are an example of something: - people care about the quality of - are fairly expensive (to test and destroy) - whose quality as an assembled produce cannot necessarily be determined by the quality of its parts > Evan, you obviously have a keen insight for the testing issues. Why not > help design tests that have real-World value and can be conducted at a > reasonable expense. I'll sleep on this one. I have no engineering experience, but I want to put my money in the right boat. In fact, I'm considering buying an Explorer myself. It durability is pretty apparent (anecdotally). However, when it's time to buy the wife's boat (she's very concerned about its weight) it would be nice to know more on this topic so maybe we'd could get her a lighter boat.. Evan *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Jan 06 2000 - 12:42:31 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:18 PDT