Re: [Paddlewise] Durability Testing

From: Evan Easton <evan_at_eeaston.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 15:10:56 -0600
>     How many is many?

Good question.  It depends :-)

> Yes, we would have to follow your description to work
> data out to the nth degree but who said we needed that kind of accuracy?
> Again, I say, any information is better than none.  I agree with the
details
> of your argument but not the spirit.

I (in my sometimes cynical way) was trying to impart that, some information
isn't always better than none.  Information is easily misused*.  I was not
trying to discourage discussion of whether heavier is better, just infuse
some healthy skepticism.

Evan

* Here are couple of entertaining, quick-reading, small books on how numbers
can be misued:
    John Allen Paulos, "Innumeracy"
    Darrell Huff, "How to Lie with Statistics"



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu Jan 06 2000 - 13:33:57 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:18 PDT