> How many is many? Good question. It depends :-) > Yes, we would have to follow your description to work > data out to the nth degree but who said we needed that kind of accuracy? > Again, I say, any information is better than none. I agree with the details > of your argument but not the spirit. I (in my sometimes cynical way) was trying to impart that, some information isn't always better than none. Information is easily misused*. I was not trying to discourage discussion of whether heavier is better, just infuse some healthy skepticism. Evan * Here are couple of entertaining, quick-reading, small books on how numbers can be misued: John Allen Paulos, "Innumeracy" Darrell Huff, "How to Lie with Statistics" *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Jan 06 2000 - 13:33:57 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:18 PDT