I posted a message to the baidarka mailing list _at_ <baidarka_at_lists.intelenet.net> and was pleasantly surprised with two responses from this obviously mature group of paddlers and baidarka builders. I've been a lurker on their list for a while, put have never posted before, lest I "get under their skin" - what with me being a hard-case hardshell paddler who likes stiff kayaks! Just before showing you the results, I wanted to thank Jack Matin for his response, as it was one of the few when I posed the question on PW. Jack, if you remember, said that Mr. Padilla Jr. used a sleeping pad "partly up against the vertical coaming ring, and leaned back against it...The after deck on his boat was very low, probably well below waist height, so there was no back or even lumbar support, although it appeared that he used it in leveraging some [...]" The other responder (to Jack, in this case), was Greg Stamer. Greg said Maligiaq stored his boat at Greg's house and let him use it. Greg said "that the deck beam immediately behind the cockpit rim, on which the back of the coaming rests, is the back support. This provides solid support, low on your back and does not interfere with techniques that require you to lay on the afterdeck. Some Greenlanders make the back support wider than a normal deck beam and slightly curved to comfortably cradle the back..." and that the foam pad made it "easier to enter and exit the kayak (which was less than 6" deep) and to make a comfortable seat..." and that the "pad helps prevent your heels from snagging on the ribs during entry and slides forward as you wriggle in." Greg, thank you for adding your insight. My question to the Baidarka list was thus: >>This is my first post to the list. I have been lurking for a couple of years now. I intend to build a baidarka within the next 5 years, but don't have the time now, unless you consider reading the info and saving web sites, etc, from this great list as preparatory work. I have referred a number of people to the list too.>> >>My question stems from a Paddlewise issue regarding back-support for your lower back. Could someone let me know what different approaches were used traditionally to outfit kayaks for adequate lower back-support.>> >>I would like to pass on the info generically. I will also need to know for my own boat one day. Hope this is not too dumb a question. Thanks in advance.>> One of the responders said that they did not know the traditional approaches, but did express their own need for a firm lower back support in at least the baidarkas they have built, and that was the reason why they had lowered the deck on a wooden baidarka. The other responder was an excellent poster by the name of Ralph Hoehn, living in Stamford, CT, at <RCH3149_at_aol.com>, who made one general comment on the traditional use of backrests, or rather lack thereof (-1-), plus two non-traditional solutions (-2- and -3- below): >1 a) - The two British gentlemen John J. Ramwell and John Brand (et al), >emminences grises in kayakig an the history thereof, report that there is no >evidence that traditional kayaks were ever equipped with any form of >backrest. Inuit may at times have rested against the aft end of the coaming, >but it appears more likely that the "ball joint" theory originated with them, >preceding its advocacy by the Germans quoted below. > >1 b) - I'm in the process of translating from the German original an >excellent instructional "Primer for Folding Kayak Builders". It contains the >results of German white water "Eskimo"-kayak building tradition since the >1920s. The boats, by the example of which the building techniques are >illustrated, are based on various Greenland types, although adapted for white >water use in certain details (rounded stem and stern post transitions into >the keelson, for example). The strict advice is to keep the lower back >completely free to pivot "like a ball joint", so as to accomodate the need to >react to highly agitated water. The same applies in rough coastal conditions, >of course. > >2 - The author does admit, though, that this may not be possible for hours >and days on end, unless you are born and bred to paddling. On quiet stretches >of water, he reports having been very satisfied for years relying for lumbar >support on a well stuffed dry bag, wedged into the space behind the seat. > >3 - His most recent addition to his boats is a back rest consisting of two >thin vertical slats, slightly twisted towards one another, with enough of a >gap in between to ensure that no vertebrae come into painful contact with the >wood. The cross piece is also shaped to avoid any bone contact. The bottom of >the assembly is equiped with two pegs, which engage any pair of a series of >holes in the aft end of the seat. This allows for adjusting the angle. The >top end merely rests against the aft part of the coaming. The whole >contraption should be secured by use of a strap to avoid losing it during a >wet exit and also to prevent it from being pulled forward while the paddler >seats himself. have this strap run from the cross piece to the bottom of the >frame at the aft end of the cockpit. Ralph said that if I wished to publish the above on "paddlewise", for good order's sake, then I was to please cite as the source Messrs. Brand and Ramwell, as well as Mr. Lorenz Mayr, the German folding boat author; and that if I were to mention his involvement by way of the translation work, that it might then help future awareness and enhanced distribution of the book, once it has been published -- hopefully still this year. I was feeling a little weird after posting to PW earlier last week that I didn't use much in the way of back support anymore -- just a bit of a bum-stop and a padded cockpit rim if I lean back, and that one should remember to always allow for free torso rotation with any seating arrangement. I see I'm in good company now. Maybe I've got native Eskimo blood in my family lineage. That would explain why I blubber-on about stuff :-) BC'in Ya Doug Lloyd (who says we should add Macho to the banned-word-list, along with Sp*ns*ns) *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
> From: Doug Lloyd <dlloyd_at_bc.sympatico.ca> > > BC'in Ya > Doug Lloyd (who says we should add Macho to the banned-word-list, along > with Sp*ns*ns) Hi Doug, Actually, the word sponson is not banned from PaddleWise. It was the desire to be able to productively discuss sponsons that, in part, gave PaddleWise its start. For anyone interested in that discussion, you can find it in the topics section on the PaddleWise website http://www.paddlewise.net/topics/boatequip/sponson.html Cheers, Jackie *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
Thanks Jackie. Being new to the list, I didn't realize that some were so adverse to an open discussion on sponsons. I hope that I receive some reasoned response with respect to my question. Regards: Ca Kayaker Fred Thomas At 01:13 AM 1/24/2000 -0800, you wrote: > > From: Doug Lloyd <dlloyd_at_bc.sympatico.ca> > > > > > BC'in Ya > > Doug Lloyd (who says we should add Macho to the banned-word-list, along > > with Sp*ns*ns) > >Hi Doug, > >Actually, the word sponson is not banned from PaddleWise. It was the >desire to be able to productively discuss sponsons that, in part, gave >PaddleWise its start. For anyone interested in that discussion, you >can find it in the topics section on the PaddleWise website >http://www.paddlewise.net/topics/boatequip/sponson.html > >Cheers, > >Jackie > > >*************************************************************************** >PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not >to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission >Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net >Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net >Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ >*************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
> Thanks Jackie. Being new to the list, I didn't realize that some were so > adverse to an open discussion on sponsons. > I hope that I receive some reasoned response with respect to my question. Hi Fred, Doug was really just kidding around. :-) Folks aren't adverse to the discussion on sponsons... just a particular manufacturer that used to bombard another list in a most fanatic way about the virtues of owning *his* sponsons. If you have a question about sponsons, I'm sure someone here can give you the low-down. So, feel free to ask away about anything on sponsons :-) In another thread for those of you that might have missed it (sorry, but I did 8-} Fred asked: > I would like to know what the more experienced paddlers on this page > think of the use of sponsoons. I think you'll find lots of good discussion at that URL I mentioned in the last post. Should be updated, though, as it's about two years old. Cheers, Jackie *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
Fred said: > Thanks Jackie. Being new to the list, I didn't realize that some were so > adverse to an open discussion on sponsons. > I hope that I receive some reasoned response with respect to my question. Jackie said: Doug was really just kidding around. :-) Folks aren't adverse to the discussion on sponsons... just a particular manufacturer that used to bombard another list in a most fanatic way about the virtues of owning *his* sponsons. If you have a question about sponsons, I'm sure someone here can give you the low-down. So, feel free to ask away about anything on sponsons :-) Fred said: > I would like to know what the more experienced paddlers on this page > think of the use of sponsoons. The sponson design has been improved over the ensuing years, with respect to the attachment system. Our local kayak retailer brings them in for the guides mostly. BC is big into guiding, and has an organized association with provincial government involvement. BC guides are amongst the best in the world, and consider effective safety devices an added asset in some cases. Some of them appreciate the stability afforded by the sponsons width stabilization of troubled paddlers. Although there are a number of ways to assist a single kayak user in difficulty, sponsons remain a viable option, and not just for commercial operators. One point I would like to emphasis, global to this post about one method of assisting wobbly-wayward novices or even advanced paddlers in difficulty (or one-time clients such as on commercial trips), is that _have you thought through_ what you are going to do if someone does get into trouble? What methods do you have to deal with the situation? What devices? Can you utilize a couple of paddle floats? Are there enough people to form a raft consisting of one person holding on to the paddler in distress, yet leaving enough people to tow the raft to safety? It _does not_ have to be extreme-like conditions for a paddler to have problems. Over the last couple of decades, I've seen it all - paddlers desperately ill, due to not changing the water in their water bottle since their last trip; new paddlers totally in panic mode, unable to deal with their lack of perceived stability, then placing undue requirements on a partner or group (to the point where they physically will not let go of you, even after attempts to calm them down). So, think it through, that's all I'm saying. Sponsons may figure into your equation, maybe not, but don't stick up your nose at them as an inferior product per say, or simply because its the "cool" thing to "run-down" on Paddlewise. I'll take that advice to heart, too. BC'in Ya Doug Lloyd (being serious today, for once) *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
Hi Bill Newman here, Yes I admit it I have a set of sponsons in my garage. I purchased them for a big crossing that I did with Don Dimond. Our thinking was that if either of us was very ill or if we had to sleep for an extended period in our boats it would be worth deploying them. For the most part I agree with Dougs summary about sponsons being a possible way to stabilze an injured or ill paddler. As for self rescue whether the ease of deployment has improved or not I think they are too slow and cumbersome to be practical. I would much rather use a paddle float for a reentry roll or hopefully use another paddler for a quick team rescue. Since I am not likely to be towing a sick kayaker across sixty miles of open water or having to spend the night sleeping in my kayak, on most paddles the sponsons live in my garage and will probably stay there. I find that using two paddle floats to give a sick or injured paddler " training wheels " is a fast easy way to stabilize your paddling partner. If you have more than two paddlers in the group rafting up would be the way to go unless you had a very long tow ahead of you. Even then the best answer in my opinion is to have at least four paddler so you can have two tow boats and one raft. That gives you a lot of towing power and one person is always resting in the raft. I have gotten in to the habit of always having two paddle floats with me so I can stabilize another paddler and as a backup for myself if for some reason I lost a paddle float during a self rescue attempt. Sponsons are just too slow and cumbersome to deploy (esepecially for us northern folks who prefer to spend as little time in the icy water as we can!). *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
Doug Lloyd wrote: > It _does not_ have to be extreme-like conditions for a paddler to have > problems. Over the last couple of decades, I've seen it all - paddlers > desperately ill, due to not changing the water in their water bottle since > their last trip; new paddlers totally in panic mode, unable to deal with > their lack of perceived stability, then placing undue requirements on a > partner or group (to the point where they physically will not let go of > you, even after attempts to calm them down). > > So, think it through, that's all I'm saying. Sponsons may figure into your > equation, maybe not, but don't stick up your nose at them as an inferior > product per say, or simply because its the "cool" thing to "run-down" on > Paddlewise. I'll take that advice to heart, too. > > BC'in Ya > Doug Lloyd (being serious today, for once) There is no issue that seawings or sponsons are a desirable item to have along for use by a paddler who is injured or ill or one who has capsized a few times and is now shaky and libel to repeatedly tip over. That is what was so sad about the episode a few years ago in which the maker of them bombarded the previous listserv and other forums with his propaganda and insistence that non having or using sponsons was an act of baby killers (this is a shortened version of what happened). It is/was a good product but he did more to bury it than any opposition would have. Of course, if you have a boat with the sponsons already part of its design ... :-) ralph diaz -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024 Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com "Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
At 03:51 PM 1/24/00 -0600, Bill wrote: <snip> For the most part I agree with Dougs summary about >sponsons being a possible way to stabilze an injured or ill paddler. As for >self rescue whether the ease of deployment has improved or not I think they are >too slow and cumbersome to be practical. I would much rather use a paddle float >for a reentry roll or hopefully use another paddler for a quick team rescue. I agree, and that is what I usually promote in various articles, etc. I didn't recommend the sponsons in my post for _self rescue_ (of course, I didn't say no to that either). Like Bill, I carry two rescue floats, and that's enough (I have a Sea Seat as ultimate back-up). <snip> >I find that using two >paddle floats to give a sick or injured paddler " training wheels " is a fast >easy way to stabilize your paddling partner. This works very well, actually. Some of the Vancouver BC clubs that offer support and training to handicapped paddlers use this same technique. I wish more people would practice a few of these ideas, at least once every few years, to add to their repertoire of emergency options. Thanks for your post Bill. We always forget about you when we talk about big crossings, as Don usually gets the attention (not that either of you care about that, I'm sure). Paddle on. BC'in Ya Doug Lloyd *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Doug Lloyd wrote: > I posted a message to the baidarka mailing list _at_ > <baidarka_at_lists.intelenet.net> and > was pleasantly surprised with two responses from this obviously mature > group of paddlers and baidarka builders. I've been a lurker on their list > for a while, put have never posted before, lest I "get under their skin" - > what with me being a hard-case hardshell paddler who likes stiff kayaks! You might check with Harvey Golden, since you only got 2 responses. Harvey's a fairly prolific native watercraft builder. He's got quite a few interesting boats on his site http://home.pacifier.com/~qajaq I'm pretty sure Harvey built the boat Maligiaq paddled while he was in the US. kirk still sigless after all these years. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
At 03:41 PM 1/24/00 -0500, Kirk Olsen wrote: >I'm pretty sure Harvey built the boat Maligiaq paddled while he was in the >US. Kirk, I agree that Harvey Golden would be an excellent source to contact. He has built an incredible number of replicas and generously shares his knowledge. Regarding Maligiaq's kayak, he used several different boats during his U.S. tour. Most folks on the East coast saw the kayak that Maligiaq built in Texas in John Heath's workshop. This is the white nylon/hypalon kayak shown in Heath's new "Rolling with Maligiaq" video. Maligiaq used Harvey Golden's replica for at least one demonstration on the West Coast and for the underwater rolling scenes in "Rolling with Maligiaq". In California Maligiaq built another kayak in exchange for room and board and used the boat for local demonstrations. This is probably just a partial list. Maligiaq had quite an amazing tour, even John Heath had trouble keeping track of his whereabouts. Greg Stamer *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:07 PDT