PaddleWise by thread

From: Doug Lloyd <dlloyd_at_bc.sympatico.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] baidarka Back Support
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 23:06:10 -0800
I posted a message to the baidarka mailing list _at_
<baidarka_at_lists.intelenet.net> and
was pleasantly surprised with two responses from this obviously mature
group of paddlers and baidarka builders. I've been a lurker on their list
for a while, put have never posted before, lest I "get under their skin" -
what with me being a hard-case hardshell paddler who likes stiff kayaks!

Just before showing you the results, I wanted to thank Jack Matin for his
response, as it was one of the few when I posed the question on PW. Jack,
if you remember, said that Mr. Padilla Jr. used a sleeping pad "partly up
against the vertical coaming ring, and leaned back against it...The after
deck on his boat was very low, probably well below waist height, so there
was no back or even lumbar support, although it appeared that he used it in
leveraging some [...]" 

The other responder (to Jack, in this case), was Greg Stamer. Greg said
Maligiaq stored his boat at Greg's house and let him use it. Greg said
"that the deck beam immediately behind the cockpit rim, on which the back
of the coaming rests, is the back support. This provides solid support, low
on your back and does not interfere with techniques that require you to lay
on the afterdeck. Some Greenlanders make
the back support wider than a normal deck beam and slightly curved to
comfortably cradle the back..." and that the foam pad made it "easier to
enter and exit the kayak
(which was less than 6" deep) and to make a comfortable seat..." and that
the "pad helps prevent your heels from snagging on the ribs during entry
and slides forward as you wriggle in." Greg, thank you for adding your
insight.

My question to the Baidarka list was thus:

>>This is my first post to the list. I have been lurking for a couple of
years now. I intend to build a baidarka within the next 5 years, but don't
have the time now, unless you consider reading the info and saving web
sites, etc, from this great list as preparatory work. I have referred a
number of people to the list too.>>

>>My question stems from a Paddlewise issue regarding back-support for your
lower back. Could someone let me know what different approaches were used
traditionally to outfit kayaks for adequate lower back-support.>>

>>I would like to pass on the info generically. I will also need to know for
my own boat one day. Hope this is not too dumb a question. Thanks in
advance.>>

One of the responders said that they did not know the traditional
approaches, but did express their own need for a firm lower back support in
at least the baidarkas they have built, and that was the reason why they
had lowered the deck on a wooden
baidarka. 

The other responder was an excellent poster by the name of Ralph Hoehn,
living in
Stamford, CT, at <RCH3149_at_aol.com>, who made one general comment on the
traditional use of backrests, or rather lack thereof (-1-), plus two
non-traditional solutions (-2- and -3- below):

>1 a) - The two British gentlemen John J. Ramwell and John Brand (et al), 
>emminences grises in kayakig an the history thereof, report that there is no 
>evidence that traditional kayaks were ever equipped with any form of 
>backrest. Inuit may at times have rested against the aft end of the coaming, 
>but it appears more likely that the "ball joint" theory originated with
them, 
>preceding its advocacy by the Germans quoted below.
>
>1 b) - I'm in the process of translating from the German original an 
>excellent instructional "Primer for Folding Kayak Builders". It contains the 
>results of German white water "Eskimo"-kayak building tradition since the 
>1920s. The boats, by the example of which the building techniques are 
>illustrated, are based on various Greenland types, although adapted for
white 
>water use in certain details (rounded stem and stern post transitions into 
>the keelson, for example). The strict advice is to keep the lower back 
>completely free to pivot "like a ball joint", so as to accomodate the need
to 
>react to highly agitated water. The same applies in rough coastal
conditions, 
>of course.
>
>2 - The author does admit, though, that this may not be possible for hours 
>and days on end, unless you are born and bred to paddling. On quiet
stretches 
>of water, he reports having been very satisfied for years relying for lumbar 
>support on a well stuffed dry bag, wedged into the space behind the seat. 
>
>3 - His most recent addition to his boats is a back rest consisting of two 
>thin vertical slats, slightly twisted towards one another, with enough of a 
>gap in between to ensure that no vertebrae come into painful contact with
the 
>wood. The cross piece is also shaped to avoid any bone contact. The bottom
of 
>the assembly is equiped with two pegs, which engage any pair of a series of 
>holes in the aft end of the seat. This allows for adjusting the angle. The 
>top end merely rests against the aft part of the coaming. The whole 
>contraption should be secured by use of a strap to avoid losing it during a 
>wet exit and also to prevent it from being pulled forward while the paddler 
>seats himself. have this strap run from the cross piece to the bottom of the 
>frame at the aft end of the cockpit.

Ralph said that if I wished to publish the above  on "paddlewise", for good
order's sake, then I was to please cite as the source Messrs. Brand and
Ramwell, as well as Mr. Lorenz Mayr, the German folding boat author; and
that if I were to mention his involvement by way of the translation work,
that it might then help future awareness and enhanced distribution of the
book, once it has been published -- hopefully still this year.

I was feeling a little weird after posting to PW earlier last week that I
didn't use much in the way of back support anymore -- just a bit of a
bum-stop and a padded cockpit rim if I lean back, and that one should
remember to always allow for free torso rotation with any seating
arrangement. I see I'm in good company now. Maybe I've got native Eskimo
blood in my family lineage. That would explain why I blubber-on about stuff
:-)

BC'in Ya
Doug Lloyd (who says we should add Macho to the banned-word-list, along
with Sp*ns*ns)

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Fenton <jackie_at_intelenet.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] baidarka Back Support
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 01:13:55 -0800 (PST)
> From: Doug Lloyd <dlloyd_at_bc.sympatico.ca>

> 
> BC'in Ya
> Doug Lloyd (who says we should add Macho to the banned-word-list, along
> with Sp*ns*ns)

Hi Doug,

Actually, the word sponson is not banned from PaddleWise.  It was the 
desire to be able to productively discuss sponsons that, in part, gave 
PaddleWise its start.  For anyone interested in that discussion, you 
can find it in the topics section on the PaddleWise website
http://www.paddlewise.net/topics/boatequip/sponson.html 

Cheers,

Jackie


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: CA Kayaker <cakayak_at_mindspring.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] baidarka Back Support and Sp*ns*ns
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 02:36:06 -0800
Thanks Jackie.  Being new to the list, I didn't realize that some were so 
adverse to an open discussion on sponsons.
I hope that I receive some reasoned response with respect to my question.

Regards:
Ca Kayaker
Fred Thomas

At 01:13 AM 1/24/2000 -0800, you wrote:
> > From: Doug Lloyd <dlloyd_at_bc.sympatico.ca>
>
> >
> > BC'in Ya
> > Doug Lloyd (who says we should add Macho to the banned-word-list, along
> > with Sp*ns*ns)
>
>Hi Doug,
>
>Actually, the word sponson is not banned from PaddleWise.  It was the
>desire to be able to productively discuss sponsons that, in part, gave
>PaddleWise its start.  For anyone interested in that discussion, you
>can find it in the topics section on the PaddleWise website
>http://www.paddlewise.net/topics/boatequip/sponson.html
>
>Cheers,
>
>Jackie
>
>
>***************************************************************************
>PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
>to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
>Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
>Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
>Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
>***************************************************************************


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Fenton <jackie_at_intelenet.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] baidarka Back Support and Sp*ns*ns
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 03:05:49 -0800 (PST)
> Thanks Jackie.  Being new to the list, I didn't realize that some were so 
> adverse to an open discussion on sponsons.
> I hope that I receive some reasoned response with respect to my question.

Hi Fred,

Doug was really just kidding around.  :-)

Folks aren't adverse to the discussion on sponsons... just a particular
manufacturer that used to bombard another list in a most fanatic way
about the virtues of owning *his* sponsons.  If you have a question about
sponsons, I'm sure someone here can give you the low-down.  So, feel free
to ask away about anything on sponsons :-)

In another thread for those of you that might have missed it (sorry, but I
did 8-}  Fred asked:

> I would like to know what the more experienced paddlers on this page 
> think of the use of sponsoons.

I think you'll find lots of good discussion at that URL I mentioned in the 
last post.  Should be updated, though, as it's about two years old.

Cheers,

Jackie

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <dlloyd_at_telus.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] baidarka Back Support and Sp*ns*ns
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:14:07 -0800
Fred said:
> Thanks Jackie.  Being new to the list, I didn't realize that some were so 
> adverse to an open discussion on sponsons.
> I hope that I receive some reasoned response with respect to my question.

Jackie said:

Doug was really just kidding around.  :-)

Folks aren't adverse to the discussion on sponsons... just a particular
manufacturer that used to bombard another list in a most fanatic way
about the virtues of owning *his* sponsons.  If you have a question about
sponsons, I'm sure someone here can give you the low-down.  So, feel free
to ask away about anything on sponsons :-)

Fred said:

> I would like to know what the more experienced paddlers on this page 
> think of the use of sponsoons.

The sponson design has been improved over the ensuing years, with respect
to the attachment system. Our local kayak retailer brings them in for the
guides mostly. BC is big into guiding, and has an organized association
with provincial government involvement. BC guides are amongst the best in
the world, and consider effective safety devices an added asset in some
cases. Some of them appreciate the stability afforded by the sponsons width
stabilization of troubled paddlers. 

Although there are a number of ways to assist a single kayak user in
difficulty, sponsons remain a viable option, and not just for commercial
operators. One point I would like to emphasis, global to this post about
one method of assisting wobbly-wayward novices or even advanced paddlers in
difficulty (or one-time clients such as on commercial trips), is that _have
you thought through_ what you are going to do if someone does get into
trouble? What methods do you have to deal with the situation? What devices?
Can you utilize a couple of paddle floats? Are there enough people to form
a raft consisting of one person holding on to the paddler in distress, yet
leaving enough people to tow the raft to safety?

It _does not_ have to be extreme-like conditions for a paddler to have
problems. Over the last couple of decades, I've seen it all - paddlers
desperately ill, due to not changing the water in their water bottle since
their last trip; new paddlers totally in panic mode, unable to deal with
their lack of perceived stability, then placing undue requirements on a
partner or group (to the point where they physically will not let go of
you, even after attempts to calm them down).

So, think it through, that's all I'm saying. Sponsons may figure into your
equation, maybe not, but don't stick up your nose at them as an inferior
product per say, or simply because its the "cool" thing to "run-down" on
Paddlewise. I'll take that advice to heart, too.

BC'in Ya
Doug Lloyd (being serious today, for once)
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <wanewman_at_uswest.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] baidarka Back Support and Sp*ns*ns
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:51:56 -0600
Hi Bill Newman here,

Yes I admit it I have a set of sponsons in my garage.  I purchased them for a
big crossing that I did with Don Dimond.  Our thinking was that if either of us
was very ill or if we had to sleep for an extended period in our boats it would
be worth deploying them.  For the most part I agree with Dougs summary about
sponsons being a possible way to stabilze an injured or ill paddler.  As for
self rescue whether the ease of deployment has improved or not I think they are
too slow and cumbersome to be practical.  I would much rather use a paddle float
for a reentry roll or hopefully use another paddler for a quick team rescue.

Since I am not likely to be towing a sick kayaker across sixty miles of open
water or having to spend the night sleeping in my kayak, on most paddles the
sponsons live in my garage and will probably stay there.  I find that using two
paddle floats to give a sick or injured paddler " training wheels " is a fast
easy way to stabilize your paddling partner.  If you have more than two paddlers
in the group rafting up would be the way to go unless you had a very long tow
ahead of you.  Even then the best answer in my opinion is to have at least four
paddler so you can have two tow boats and one raft.  That gives you a lot of
towing power and one person is always resting in the raft.

I have gotten in to the habit of always having two paddle floats with me so I
can stabilize another paddler and as a backup for myself if for some reason I
lost a paddle float during a self rescue attempt.  Sponsons are just too slow
and cumbersome to deploy (esepecially for us northern folks who prefer to spend
as little time in the icy water as we can!).



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: ralph diaz <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] baidarka Back Support and Sp*ns*ns
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:24:43 -0800
Doug Lloyd wrote:

> It _does not_ have to be extreme-like conditions for a paddler to have
> problems. Over the last couple of decades, I've seen it all - paddlers
> desperately ill, due to not changing the water in their water bottle since
> their last trip; new paddlers totally in panic mode, unable to deal with
> their lack of perceived stability, then placing undue requirements on a
> partner or group (to the point where they physically will not let go of
> you, even after attempts to calm them down).
> 
> So, think it through, that's all I'm saying. Sponsons may figure into your
> equation, maybe not, but don't stick up your nose at them as an inferior
> product per say, or simply because its the "cool" thing to "run-down" on
> Paddlewise. I'll take that advice to heart, too.
> 
> BC'in Ya
> Doug Lloyd (being serious today, for once)

There is no issue that seawings or sponsons are a desirable item to have
along for use by a paddler who is injured or ill or one who has capsized
a few times and is now shaky and libel to repeatedly tip over.  That is
what was so sad about the episode a few years ago in which the maker of
them bombarded the previous listserv and other forums with his
propaganda and insistence that non having or using sponsons was an act
of baby killers (this is a shortened version of what happened).  It
is/was a good product but he did more to bury it than any opposition
would have.

Of course, if you have a boat with the sponsons already part of its
design ... :-)

ralph diaz

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <dlloyd_at_bc.sympatico.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] baidarka Back Support and Sp*ns*ns
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 23:02:55 -0800
At 03:51 PM 1/24/00 -0600, Bill wrote:

<snip> For the most part I agree with Dougs summary about
>sponsons being a possible way to stabilze an injured or ill paddler.  As for
>self rescue whether the ease of deployment has improved or not I think
they are
>too slow and cumbersome to be practical.  I would much rather use a paddle
float
>for a reentry roll or hopefully use another paddler for a quick team rescue.

I agree, and that is what I usually promote in various articles, etc. I
didn't recommend the sponsons in my post for _self rescue_ (of course, I
didn't say no to that either). Like Bill, I carry two rescue floats, and
that's enough (I have a Sea Seat as ultimate back-up).  

<snip>
>I find that using two
>paddle floats to give a sick or injured paddler " training wheels " is a fast
>easy way to stabilize your paddling partner.  

This works very well, actually. Some of the Vancouver BC clubs that offer
support and training to handicapped paddlers use this same technique. I
wish more people would practice a few of these ideas, at least once every
few years, to add to their repertoire of emergency options.

Thanks for your post Bill. We always forget about you when we talk about
big crossings, as Don usually gets the attention (not that either of you
care about that, I'm sure). Paddle on.

BC'in Ya
Doug Lloyd


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Kirk Olsen <kolsen_at_imagelan.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] baidarka Back Support
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:41:38 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Doug Lloyd wrote:

> I posted a message to the baidarka mailing list _at_
> <baidarka_at_lists.intelenet.net> and
> was pleasantly surprised with two responses from this obviously mature
> group of paddlers and baidarka builders. I've been a lurker on their list
> for a while, put have never posted before, lest I "get under their skin" -
> what with me being a hard-case hardshell paddler who likes stiff kayaks!

You might check with Harvey Golden, since you only got 2 responses.
Harvey's a fairly prolific native watercraft builder.  He's got quite
a few interesting boats on his site http://home.pacifier.com/~qajaq

I'm pretty sure Harvey built the boat Maligiaq paddled while he was in the
US.


kirk
still sigless after all these years.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Greg Stamer <gstamer_at_magicnet.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] baidarka Back Support
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 21:36:24 -0500
At 03:41 PM 1/24/00 -0500, Kirk Olsen wrote:
>I'm pretty sure Harvey built the boat Maligiaq paddled while he was in the
>US.

Kirk,

I agree that Harvey Golden would be an excellent source to contact. He has
built an incredible number of replicas and generously shares his knowledge.

Regarding Maligiaq's kayak, he used several different boats during his U.S.
tour. Most folks on the East coast saw the kayak that Maligiaq built in
Texas in John Heath's workshop. This is the white nylon/hypalon kayak shown
in Heath's new "Rolling with Maligiaq" video. Maligiaq used Harvey Golden's
replica for at least one demonstration on the West Coast and for the
underwater rolling scenes in "Rolling with Maligiaq". In California
Maligiaq built another kayak in exchange for room and board and used the
boat for local demonstrations. This is probably just a partial list.
Maligiaq had quite an amazing tour, even John Heath had trouble keeping
track of his whereabouts.

Greg Stamer


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:07 PDT