>Careful about interpreting these standard definitions for waterproofness. They >are used in watches as well and have a totally different meaning when >interpreted from a technicians point of view. > >When they quote that standard and a depth of one meter they are really talking >about the pressure equivalent to a depth of one meter of *unmoving water*. So...this makes me wonder about my new Pentax WR105 camera. It's stated depth is one meter, and I've rolled with it tucked inside my PFD. Should I be worried? Has anyone ever had a WR105/WR90 fail after a roll? Shawn >When buying a watch I was told to go for a least 30 meters to be save when >swimming on the surface. Hmmm...I always wondered about the depth on watches. I've never owned a "waterproof" watch that was for less than 30 meters. Of course, I've never been below 3 meters--makes my ears/sinuses hurt too much! Shawn -- Shawn W. Baker 0 46°53'N © 2000 ____©/______ 114°06'W ~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^\ ,/ /~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^ baker_at_montana.com 0 http://www.geocities.com/shawnkayak/ *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed May 10 2000 - 13:06:12 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:24 PDT