At 08:40 AM 5/15/00 -0400, Nick Schade wrote: >I need to chime-in in disagreement with the generalizations. Each boat >needs to be evaluated on its own. There is no performance criteria that can >be accurately predicted by looking at the flag decal on a kayak. There are >stable and slow British kayaks. There are tippy and fast North American >boats. There are British boats perceived as rugged which are very poorly >built. There are rugged N American boats. Ah, but the one place where Brit boats are undeniably superior is CHARISMA. Let's be honest. Take the Nordkapp, for example. This is an old design that many people will admit has some deficiencies compared to more modern boats -- even Doug has modified his to the point where it's scarcely recognisible. But pull into a parking lot full of kayakers with a Nordkapp on top of your car and most people are going to think that you're a kayaker that's a few cuts above the norm. That'll put those jokers with those plastic boats in their place! ;-) What's more important -- form or substance? -- Wes *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon May 15 2000 - 09:27:03 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:24 PDT