PaddleWise by thread

From: Bob Denton <BDenton_at_aquagulf.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Waterproof rating of electronic devices (was: GP S)
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 16:34:40 -0400
The watches are rated in a static situation. When you are moving your hand
through the water, the pressure increases significantly.

cya

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
[mailto:owner-paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net]On Behalf Of Shawn W. Baker
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 4:05 PM
To: Ferdinand Soethe; Paddlewise
Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Waterproof rating of electronic devices (was:
GPS)


>Careful about interpreting these standard definitions for waterproofness.
They
>are used in watches as well and have a totally different meaning when
>interpreted from a technicians point of view.
>
>When they quote that standard and a depth of one meter they are really
talking
>about the pressure equivalent to a depth of one meter of *unmoving water*.

So...this makes me wonder about my new Pentax WR105 camera.  It's stated
depth is one meter, and I've rolled with it tucked inside my PFD. 
Should I be worried?  Has anyone ever had a WR105/WR90 fail after a
roll?

Shawn

>When buying a watch I was told to go for a least 30 meters to be save when
>swimming on the surface.

Hmmm...I always wondered about the depth on watches.  I've never owned a
"waterproof" watch that was for less than 30 meters.  Of course, I've
never been below 3 meters--makes my ears/sinuses hurt too much!

Shawn

-- 
Shawn W. Baker          0                                    46°53'N
© 2000            ____©/______                              114°06'W
~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^\  ,/      /~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^
baker_at_montana.com    0        http://www.geocities.com/shawnkayak/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Seng, Dave <Dave_Seng_at_health.state.ak.us>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Waterproof rating of electronic devices (was: GP S)
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 13:00:55 -0800
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn W. Baker [mailto:baker_at_montana.com]
> 
> So...this makes me wonder about my new Pentax WR105 camera.  
> It's stated
> depth is one meter, and I've rolled with it tucked inside my PFD. 
> Should I be worried?  Has anyone ever had a WR105/WR90 fail after a
> roll?
> 
  My 4 yr old Pentax WR90 has been taken for several unplanned swims in salt
water because I forgot that I had it tucked inside my PFD.  No problems yet.

Dave Seng
Juneau, Alaska
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Cramer <cramer_at_coe.uga.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Waterproof rating of electronic devices (was:GP S)
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 17:23:21 -0400
> > Careful about interpreting these standard definitions for waterproofness.
> > They are used in watches as well and have a totally different meaning when
> > interpreted from a technicians point of view.
>
> > When they quote that standard and a depth of one meter they are really
> > talking about the pressure equivalent to a depth of one meter of 
> > *unmoving water*.

> So...this makes me wonder about my new Pentax WR105 camera.  It's stated
> depth is one meter, and I've rolled with it tucked inside my PFD.
> Should I be worried?  Has anyone ever had a WR105/WR90 fail after a
> roll?

Inside your PFD it's less than 1 meter down, and the water inside the
PFD isn't flowing very fast, is it?

My WR90 has been through Class III's with no problems.

Steve
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:13 PDT