PaddleWise by thread

From: Joshua Teitelbaum <teitelba_at_post.tau.ac.il>
subject: [Paddlewise] Boat comparing: VCP Skerray vs. NDK Romany Explorer
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 11:02:17 +0200
I thought I would post some thoughts on comparing these boats.  Please
evaluate these thoughts with the knowledge that I am perhaps an
intermediate paddler, without much experience in different boats.  This may
be of use to paddlers in a similar situation.

In the beginning, I liked the Skerray, because it seemed to turn much
easier than the Explorer.  In choppy seas, it tracked poorly without the
skeg, but pretty good with it.  The boat was slow, I thought, and the
bracing position -- mostly with the knees -- seemed uncomfortable.  Some of
this could be corrected, I suppose, by the use of foam, etc., to make the
boat fit better.

The Romany Explorer, however, fit me well.  I'm particularly enamored of
the "keyhole cockpit," which has these flange-like things that come over
the top of the thighs and a bit down the sides of the thighs.  This allows,
IMHO, for excellent bracing and seems better than bracing with the knees.
The Romany Explorers I have used have been without a skeg -- with one, they
should be great.

As I have said before, in Israel I can only try British kayaks, but in my
upcoming visit to the states I hope to try Mariner and CD kayaks as well.

Happy 4th to all Americans.  I hope you appreciate how fortunate you are
that you can throw out your government every few years -- most peoples of
the world do not have that privilege.  (Thank God we do in Israel as well!)

Josh
(dreaming of trying out kayaks in the States...)

==============================================================================
Dr. Joshua Teitelbaum, Research Fellow               Tel: [972] 3-640-6448
Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and        Fax: [972] 3-641-5802
  African Studies                                                       
Tel Aviv University
Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978  Israel
E-mail:teitelba_at_ccsg.tau.ac.il
www.dayan.org
==============================================================================
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gerald Foodman <klagjf_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Boat comparing: VCP Skerray vs. NDK Romany Explorer
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 14:44:43 -0700
Joshua,
Since you like the Romany Explorer, I would recommend doing comparative test
paddles of the Explorer, Mariner II, and Solstice GTS.  All three are
superb, efficient, and best of all forgiving boats in adverse conditions.
Here we have skeg, sliding seat and rudder in similarly sized boats with
quite different design philosophies.  So you can fairly decide which contol
mechanism you like and be assured that you are getting a fine boat no matter
which you choose.  Personally I would like to own all 3 boats, and I cannot
think of another boat I would prefer to any of the 3.

Jerry

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Chuck Holst <cholst_at_bitstream.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Boat comparing: VCP Skerray vs. NDK Romany Explorer
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 20:58:03 -0500
If you want a more maneuverable Romany, try the Romany 16!

-----Original Message-----
From:	Joshua Teitelbaum [SMTP:teitelba_at_post.tau.ac.il]
Sent:	Sunday, July 02, 2000 4:02 AM
To:	paddlewise
Subject:	[Paddlewise] Boat comparing: VCP Skerray vs. NDK Romany Explorer

I thought I would post some thoughts on comparing these boats.  Please
evaluate these thoughts with the knowledge that I am perhaps an
intermediate paddler, without much experience in different boats.  This may
be of use to paddlers in a similar situation.

In the beginning, I liked the Skerray, because it seemed to turn much
easier than the Explorer.  In choppy seas, it tracked poorly without the
skeg, but pretty good with it.  The boat was slow, I thought, and the
bracing position -- mostly with the knees -- seemed uncomfortable.  Some of
this could be corrected, I suppose, by the use of foam, etc., to make the
boat fit better.

<snip>

Josh
(dreaming of trying out kayaks in the States...)

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <volinjo_at_juno.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Boat comparing: VCP Skerray vs. NDK Romany Explorer
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:53:38 -0400
Second the motion.

Joan

On Tue, 11 Jul 2000 20:58:03 -0500 Chuck Holst <cholst_at_bitstream.net>
writes:
> If you want a more maneuverable Romany, try the Romany 16!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Joshua Teitelbaum [SMTP:teitelba_at_post.tau.ac.il]
> Sent:	Sunday, July 02, 2000 4:02 AM
> To:	paddlewise
> Subject:	[Paddlewise] Boat comparing: VCP Skerray vs. NDK 
> Romany Explorer
> 
> I thought I would post some thoughts on comparing these boats.  
> Please
> evaluate these thoughts with the knowledge that I am perhaps an
> intermediate paddler, without much experience in different boats.  
> This may
> be of use to paddlers in a similar situation.
> 
> In the beginning, I liked the Skerray, because it seemed to turn much
> easier than the Explorer.  In choppy seas, it tracked poorly without 
> the
> skeg, but pretty good with it.  The boat was slow, I thought, and the
> bracing position -- mostly with the knees -- seemed uncomfortable.  
> Some of
> this could be corrected, I suppose, by the use of foam, etc., to 
> make the
> boat fit better.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Josh
> (dreaming of trying out kayaks in the States...)
> 
>
*************************************************************************
**
> PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author 
> and not
> to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
> Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
> Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
> Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
>
*************************************************************************
**

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Fereira <jaf30_at_cornell.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Boat comparing: VCP Skerray vs. NDK Romany Explorer
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 11:57:53 -0400
At 10:53 AM 7/12/00 -0400, volinjo_at_juno.com wrote:
>Second the motion.
>
>Joan
>
>On Tue, 11 Jul 2000 20:58:03 -0500 Chuck Holst <cholst_at_bitstream.net>
>writes:
>> If you want a more maneuverable Romany, try the Romany 16!
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:	Joshua Teitelbaum [SMTP:teitelba_at_post.tau.ac.il]
>> Sent:	Sunday, July 02, 2000 4:02 AM
>> To:	paddlewise
>> Subject:	[Paddlewise] Boat comparing: VCP Skerray vs. NDK 
>> Romany Explorer
>> 
>> I thought I would post some thoughts on comparing these boats.  
>> Please
>> evaluate these thoughts with the knowledge that I am perhaps an
>> intermediate paddler, without much experience in different boats.  
>> This may
>> be of use to paddlers in a similar situation.
>> 
>> In the beginning, I liked the Skerray, because it seemed to turn much
>> easier than the Explorer.  In choppy seas, it tracked poorly without 
>> the
>> skeg, but pretty good with it.  The boat was slow, I thought, and the
>> bracing position -- mostly with the knees -- seemed uncomfortable.  
>> Some of
>> this could be corrected, I suppose, by the use of foam, etc., to 
>> make the
>> boat fit better.

While the Romany 16 is indeed more manoeverable than the Explorer and I've
only paddled each a couple of times, I own a glass Skerray and think it
gives the Romany 16 a run for its' money for manoeverability even though
it's a foot longer.  I do wish it handled better in choppy seas (especially
downwind) and I've modified the seat in mine quite a bit and added foam and
it makes a bit difference.  I haven't paddled a plastic version of the
Skerray but the glass version scoots along quite well, not as well as the
Explorer but I think better than the 16.

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jack Fu <jack.fu_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Boat comparing: VCP Skerray vs. NDK Romany Explorer
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 12:11:17 -0700
I have the regular Romany (16 ft). It handles very well
in following seas if you drop the skeg down part way.
(I've never found it necessary to drop the skeg all the
way down.) Make sure you check the skeg housing regularly
to get any sand or pebbles out.

The thigh bracing is superb.

The boat is highly maneuverable, and rolls almost as easily as
my whitewater boat (Dagger RPM).

It does not hold as much gear as the long Romany of course.
On a 6-day camping trip in the Gulf Islands I had quite a job
fitting everything in. The wheels (disassembled) and some other
stuff had to go on the deck. Even loaded to the gills like that,
it handled well and rolled easily.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-paddlewise_at_paddlewise.net
[mailto:owner-paddlewise_at_paddlewise.net]On Behalf Of John Fereira
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 8:58 AM
>> boat fit better.

While the Romany 16 is indeed more manoeverable than the Explorer and I've
only paddled each a couple of times, I own a glass Skerray and think it
gives the Romany 16 a run for its' money for manoeverability even though
it's a foot longer.  I do wish it handled better in choppy seas (especially
downwind) and I've modified the seat in mine quite a bit and added foam and
it makes a bit difference.  I haven't paddled a plastic version of the
Skerray but the glass version scoots along quite well, not as well as the
Explorer but I think better than the 16.

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:15 PDT