PaddleWise by thread

From: Mark <canoeist_at_dotzen.org>
subject: [Paddlewise] accident scenerio
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:37:37 -0600 (MDT)
ok, 8-10 of you paddle to an off shore island/ oil rig. when you return to
shore there are some mild [2-3ft?] breaking waves, and as one of your
members gets near the shore, they perl off the wave, and get "window
shaded" and impaled on their paddle [a leg injury ;-]. you are near a
road, and i'll make up whatever other "details" you need ;-) 

a:  what's your first plan of action

b:  how do you decide if the person is capable of continueing on, on their
own, or if someone needs to play ambulance driver

c:  how do you notify the "next of kin" --- ie tell them to meet you at
the hospital/ER, without adding undue stress to the callee

d:  what other factors should be involved/considered

e:  is this discussion usefull?

mark

-- 
#-canoeist[at]dotzen[dot]org-------------------------------------------
mark zen                      o,    o__              o_/|   o_.
po box 474                   </     [\/              [__|   [__\
ft. lupton, co 80621-0474 (`-/-------/----')      (`----|-------\-')
#~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~
http://www.dotzen.org/paddler     [index to club websites i administer]
---- A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner.  --  English Proverb



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Flory <daflory_at_pacbell.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] accident scenerio
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 23:46:22 -0700
I think I learned a little about this kind of thing in 30 years of
coppery, 14 of which were spent as a traffic cop investigating accidents.

One of the things I learned is never let let the injured party go off on
their own, always send someone with them. Don't let an injured party
drive. The reason for this is that shock can hit after a long delay and
they can lose consciousness in seconds, when it does. If they're driving
a car, hurrying to a hospital, this can cause more serious injuries than
the initial one(s).

Two, after you take care of the obvious injury, _always_ check the rest
of the body for other injury. While you take care of the Paddle in the
Leg, thing, if you have someone else who is experienced in first aid,
have them check for breathing, heart beat, spinal injury, etc. at the
same time you are controlling the bleeding.

In some cases the most important thing you can do is ignore the bleeding
victims and stabilize the scene. In other words make sure a truck doesn't
come driving thru' the accident scene killing you and all the victims.
This is most applicable in hiway accidents but the principle is the same
in getting an injured person off the icy cold water into a place where
they can be sheltered from the wind and kept warm as possible.

Never trust the victim to know where they are hurt. I've seen people with
visible compound fractures of the legs trying to walk, with no idea that
they were hurt. Check for their injuries yourself. Work from head to toe
and back again, _twice_, if you have time. Fortuneately, most of us are
not doctors and are protected from law suits for missing injuries, but
one doesn't want to have to live with knowing they missed something serious.

Fair winds and happy bytes,
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: B00jum! <snark_at_tulgey.org>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] accident scenerio
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:07:13 -0400 (EDT)
Mark writes:
 > On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Tina wrote:
 > 
 > > What troubles me most about Mark's unfortunate accident is the fact that he
 > > was paddling a 14+ foot touring kayak  on a class 3 - 4, 825 cfs, rocky
 > > whitewater river. When queried, he responded that he'd taken it on class 2
 > 
 > i also paddle it with some regularity on class III rivers ;-)

I think its entirely possible to take a longer boat down class III
rivers. After all the early WW boats were *much* long than they are
now.  It would IMHO, be dependent on *which* class III, what boat and
how well you can handle it.

 > > rivers,  and his friends paddled the same boats through the Grand Canyon,
 > > (8,000 to 40,000+ cubic feet/ second).
 > 
 > from the website for this boat:
 > 
 > <snip>
 > 
 > > <snip: ww vs. sea/touring kayaks: eg. tracking vs. maneuver, etc..>
 > 
 > don't confuse "touring" with "sea kayak" ;-)
 >  
 > > I've heard several sea kayak on ww river disaster stories over the years,
 > > (a Folbot totalled on a class 2 run,  Boy Scouts badly bashing up a troop
 > > of borrowed glass sea kayaks on the Deschutes), but haven't heard any
 > > successes. Is this a common practice in some areas?
 > > Tina

Tina, I don't think you hear about success stories as often since that 
isn't 'news'.  I do think that taking a longer kayak down a river
takes more caution than say river rafting.  Its probably about the
same class of caution that a WW paddler takes though.

 > again, it is mainly a matter of semantics, but in colorado, where there is
 > an extreme variety of water available to paddle, we recognize 3-4 types of
 > kayak, recreational [kiwi's etc], whitewater [sub 12 footers], touring
 > [12-16 ft], andd sea kayaks [16 foot+] ... the prijon yukon expedition is
 > an extremely popular boat in colorado.

I'm also given to understand that in Colorado (esp on the mighty
Colorado River) a different scale is used for river class.  Around
here (Oregon), I was taught the Class I-VI system (VI being by
definition unrunnable).  Often this gets broken down into II+, III+ or
IV-. 

So - is that true Mark?  Are you using a Class I-X scale to describe
the river you where running?  If so, it all makes more sense.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
snark_at_tulgey.org     aka Glen Acord	  http://www.tulgey.org/~snark
	if ($snark eq "boojum") {vanish("softly","suddenly")}



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Mark <canoeist_at_dotzen.org>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] accident scenerio
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:46:11 -0600 (MDT)
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, B00jum! wrote:
> Mark writes:
>  > On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Tina wrote:
>  > 
>  > > What troubles me most about Mark's unfortunate accident is the fact that he
>  > > was paddling a 14+ foot touring kayak  on a class 3 - 4, 825 cfs, rocky
>  > > whitewater river. When queried, he responded that he'd taken it on class 2
>  > 
>  > i also paddle it with some regularity on class III rivers ;-)
> 
> I think its entirely possible to take a longer boat down class III
> rivers. After all the early WW boats were *much* long than they are
> now.  It would IMHO, be dependent on *which* class III, what boat and
> how well you can handle it.

the dancer was about 12.5-13 ft!! but my back ground comes from canoeing,
so having 2 blades makes kayaking easy [donning my flameproof suit ;^]

 <snip>

>  > > I've heard several sea kayak on ww river disaster stories over the years,
>  > > (a Folbot totalled on a class 2 run,  Boy Scouts badly bashing up a troop
>  > > of borrowed glass sea kayaks on the Deschutes), but haven't heard any
>  > > successes. Is this a common practice in some areas?
>  > > Tina
> 
> Tina, I don't think you hear about success stories as often since that 
> isn't 'news'.  I do think that taking a longer kayak down a river
> takes more caution than say river rafting.  Its probably about the
> same class of caution that a WW paddler takes though.

a beginning WW canoeist may be on class I+ water his first year
a beginning WW kayaker will often be on class II+ water his first year
a beginning WW rafter will be bored on anything less than class III water
~~~~~
[snip]
~~~~~
>  > again, it is mainly a matter of semantics, but in colorado, where there is
>  > an extreme variety of water available to paddle, we recognize 3-4 types of
>  > kayak, recreational [kiwi's etc], whitewater [sub 12 footers], touring
>  > [12-16 ft], andd sea kayaks [16 foot+] ... the prijon yukon expedition is
>  > an extremely popular boat in colorado.
> 
> I'm also given to understand that in Colorado (esp on the mighty
> Colorado River) a different scale is used for river class.  Around
> here (Oregon), I was taught the Class I-VI system (VI being by
> definition unrunnable).  Often this gets broken down into II+, III+ or
> IV-. 
> 
> So - is that true Mark?  Are you using a Class I-X scale to describe
> the river you where running?  If so, it all makes more sense.

maybe in "the canyon" but here we use I-VI also... this was a III+/IV- but
a short duration. my down river canoe is 15'6" --- which makes this boat
seem quite nimble ;-) i have done a rough drawing of the rapid, from the
top & side views, and put it [temporarily] online at:
small [19k] http://www.diac.com/~zen/rap1.gif
large [36k] http://www.diac.com/~zen/rap1.gif

mark

-- 
#-canoeist[at]dotzen[dot]org-------------------------------------------
mark zen                      o,    o__              o_/|   o_.
po box 474                   </     [\/              [__|   [__\
ft. lupton, co 80621-0474 (`-/-------/----')      (`----|-------\-')
#~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~
http://www.dotzen.org/paddler     [index to club websites i administer]
---- A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner.  --  English Proverb

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Bob Myers <bob_at_intelenet.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] accident scenerio
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:44:48 -0700
Tina wrote:
} Subject: [Paddlewise] accident scenerio
> What troubles me most about Mark's unfortunate accident is the fact that he
> was paddling a 14+ foot touring kayak  on a class 3 - 4, 825 cfs, rocky
> whitewater river. When queried, he responded that he'd taken it on class 2
> rivers,  and his friends paddled the same boats through the Grand Canyon,
> (8,000 to 40,000+ cubic feet/ second).

...

> I've heard several sea kayak on ww river disaster stories over the years,
> (a Folbot totalled on a class 2 run,  Boy Scouts badly bashing up a troop
> of borrowed glass sea kayaks on the Deschutes), but haven't heard any
> successes. Is this a common practice in some areas?

Some years ago, Roger Schumann wrote an interesting article for Sea Kayaker
about taking full-length sea kayaks down the Grand Canyon. Ravens, I think
they were.

I think this is the reference:

Roger Schumann, "A Grand Idea: Sea Kayaking the Colorado River", 
_Sea_Kayaker_, August 1995, page 50.


It sure sounded like a real success.  Roger, are you reading this?  

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Eskape Sea Kayaking <postmaster_at_eskapekayak.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] accident scenerio: Successful uses of Sea Touring Kayaks on WW
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:56:49 -0700
> Tina wrote:
> } Subject: [Paddlewise] accident scenerio
> > What troubles me most about Mark's unfortunate accident is the fact that
he
> > was paddling a 14+ foot touring kayak  on a class 3 - 4, 825 cfs, rocky
> > whitewater river. When queried, he responded that he'd taken it on class
2
> > rivers,  and his friends paddled the same boats through the Grand
Canyon,
> > (8,000 to 40,000+ cubic feet/ second).
>
> ...
>
> > I've heard several sea kayak on ww river disaster stories over the
years,
> > (a Folbot totalled on a class 2 run,  Boy Scouts badly bashing up a
troop
> > of borrowed glass sea kayaks on the Deschutes), but haven't heard any
> > successes. Is this a common practice in some areas?
>
> Some years ago, Roger Schumann wrote an interesting article for Sea
Kayaker
> about taking full-length sea kayaks down the Grand Canyon. Ravens, I think
> they were.
>
> I think this is the reference:
>
> Roger Schumann, "A Grand Idea: Sea Kayaking the Colorado River",
> _Sea_Kayaker_, August 1995, page 50.
>
>
> It sure sounded like a real success.  Roger, are you reading this?

Yep, I'm hear, better late than never, I guess.

I suppose the short answer about taking "sea touring kayaks" down rivers has
to do with boat size relative to river size. A big boat (Eddyline Raven, 17
feet by 24") seemed to work fantastic on a big river (the Colorado flowing
between 8 and 10,000 cfs).

The long answer, which I won't go into here, has to do with the skills of
the paddler. I suppose a highly skilled paddler could navigate a Yukon
safely down a Class III flowing at only 800 cfs, but I wouldn't recommend it
for most boaters and probably wouldn't want to try it myself.

Other successes: I do have two friends who took Mariner Coasters (14 feet by
24", fiberglass sea touring "playboats"-- are you there Matt?) down a Class
I-II stretch of the San Juan River in Utah that has a couple of fairly
straightforward Class III drops. I'm not sure what the flow was, but they
did say that it was "scrapey" in places on their week-long trip. The
advantage over a WW boat is that they could carry camping gear more easily.
The advantage over a raft should be obvious to anyone who has tried to
paddle a rubber barge on flat water stretches.

The long and short of it, I suppose, is that using touring kayaks in ww can
be either stupendous or stupid, depending on the size of the kayak, the flow
and character of the river, and the paddling skills of the paddler.

Roger Schumann
ESKAPE Sea Kayaking
co-author Guide to Sea Kayaking Central and Northern California

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:16 PDT