PaddleWise by thread

From: Mark Paxton <paxtonm_at_hotmail.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] paid rescues?
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 11:51:49 PDT
As glad as I am that Jack's experience on Mt. Bachelor ended happily, I 
think he misses a vitally important distinction between on-the-water rescues 
and the kind of rescue he almost needed.

Jack made a concious decision to ignore postings warning him of the cost of 
his risky behavior.

One of the sea's greatest attractions is its very lack of lane markers 
(outside of harbors and other congested areas)and the freedom to venture 
where one pleases.  I can't imagine any tyro making a decision to risk his 
life.  Bad decision-making is based on lack of experience.  Conversely, much 
of our most valuable experience is based on past bad decision-making.  Some 
of us are more careful-lucky-blessed than others, apparently.

The high-handed rant from Down Under about paid rescues smacks of frat boy 
hazing mentality: "you have no business here until you've suffered the 
outrages I have."

Doug Lloyd's experience in his Storm Island account is common: most people 
resist summoning help until their situation is desperate.  Adding a 
financial disincentive can only further imperil the safety of a few.  Even 
if they are foolhardy and inexperienced,they're seeking what some of us are 
fortunate enough to have found.  Should they risk paying with their lives 
because they're reluctant to pay with their wallets?  The same inexperience 
that put them in danger's way may cause them to resist doing the sensible 
thing when it counts.

The Coast Guard is most directly comparable to police and fire services.  
Can you imagine the messes resulting from a user-pay system?  It's like 
insurance: we all contribute in advance, paying for the availability of 
services we fervently hope never to need.

Speaking of messes, I think we'd be asking to dive headlong into the same 
quagmire that represents our civil judicial system if we began to try to 
assess degrees of responsibility after the fact.  Aside from the legal 
wrangles, it would inevitably (and quickly) result in the same liability 
fears that already govern much conduct.  We could expect closed put-ins, 
high use fees, shoreside safety checks.  Should that happen, it'll be time 
for some of us to swap our boats for something that once again offers us a 
few hours of real freedom to make our own decisions and take our own risks.  
I'm confident I'll never need the services of the Coast Guard, just as I'm 
confident that I'll never make a claim on my fire insurance.  Just the same, 
I'm glad I have access to both.



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Outfit3029_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] paid rescues?
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:10:28 EDT
In a message dated 10/3/00 7:46:44 PM !!!First Boot!!!, paxtonm_at_hotmail.com 
writes:

<< As glad as I am that Jack's experience on Mt. Bachelor ended happily, I 
 think he misses a vitally important distinction between on-the-water rescues 
 and the kind of rescue he almost needed.
 
 Jack made a concious decision to ignore postings warning him of the cost of 
 his risky behavior. >>

  Having lived around water and professional water people my entire life. My 
Father was retired Navy, my wife's family has operated commercial vessels on 
the St. Johns River (FL) since the mid 1800s and an article in the local 
newspaper today features my son in law's family for operating commercially in 
St. Augustine for five generations. I believe that latecomers to the waters, 
in general, do not apreciate that "every time that you put on to the water 
you are putting yourself at risk."  Granted the risks are not always equal 
and preparedness and prudence can definitely work in your favor.
  The posted warning is the shoreline. We no longer "breathe" water, we are 
land based mammals. Each time that we put on the water we are engaging in 
risky behavior. Learn it, live it.

Bruce McC
WEO

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Whyte, David <DHW_at_Mail.amsa.gov.au>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] paid rescues?
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:43:45 +1100
Mark said
The high-handed rant from Down Under about paid rescues smacks of frat boy 
hazing mentality: "you have no business here until you've suffered the 
outrages I have."

Hey Mark don't associate the rest of us paddlers down under with Laurie
Fords writings - he is in a world of his own and has probably offended every
other paddler and club in Australia.

David Whyte
Australia

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <JSpinner_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] paid rescues?
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:35:01 EDT
In a message dated 10/3/00 3:46:44 PM, paxtonm_at_hotmail.com writes:

<< Should they risk paying with their lives 
because they're reluctant to pay with their wallets?  The same inexperience 
that put them in danger's way may cause them to resist doing the sensible 
thing when it counts. >>

dollars to donuts 99% of those who called wouldn't know they would be charged.
<<t.  Aside from the legal 
wrangles, it would inevitably (and quickly) result in the same liability 
fears that already govern much conduct.  We could expect closed put-ins, 
high use fees, shoreside safety checks.  Should that happen, it'll be time 
for some of us to swap our boats for something that once again offers us a 
few hours of real freedom to make our ...>>
    I ride horses and have a hell of a time finding a place to ride without 
paying through the nose for the MOST controlled ride you can imagine. I can 
easily see all rentals being kiwis on days with under 2 mph of wind and only 
being allowed 90 minutes out because I was "experienced" instead of the usual 
60 minutes out for $45.
    Insurance has all but cut off horseback riding as a rental option unless 
it is for long term leases circumscribed by miryad legal caveats. I'd hate to 
see paddling on the Bay as a victim of our need to either be "110% assured we 
are safe or we will sue "thinking.

Joan Spinner
who lived within the DC Beltway
and really does listen to all that
NPR stuff about how we act

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Fred T, CA Kayaker <cakayak_at_mindspring.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] paid rescues? and Affordability
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 08:49:28 -0700
A well thought out and written commentary by Mr. Paxton.

The statement below brings to mind:  "He said.  They thought.   But,  would 
you believe?"   Hindsight is always 20/20 and who better to tell the poor 
soul (victim) that they could have done better after the fact than a giant 
bill for a rescue.  You can only get as much justice (or should it read: 
rescue) as you can afford.

Thanks
Fred

At 11:51 AM 10/3/2000 -0700, Mark Paxton wrote:
>dive headlong into the same quagmire that represents our civil judicial 
>system if we began to try to assess degrees of responsibility after the fact.

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <dkruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] paid rescues? and Affordability
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 09:21:35 -0700
"Fred T, CA Kayaker" wrote:
> 
> A well thought out and written commentary by Mr. Paxton.
> 
> [snip] Hindsight is always 20/20 and who better to tell the poor
> soul (victim) that they could have done better after the fact than a giant
> bill for a rescue.  You can only get as much justice (or should it read:
> rescue) as you can afford.

> At 11:51 AM 10/3/2000 -0700, Mark Paxton wrote:
[we will]
> >dive headlong into the same quagmire that represents our civil judicial
> >system if we began to try to assess degrees of responsibility after the fact.

Normally I resist "me, too!" endorsements.  I can't resist this one, however.
 
Mark's post really nailed the negative aspects of an "admiralty inquiry"
focused on a person's need for a rescue.  Yet, in casual conversation with
non-boaters (including folks who have kayaked some), the almost universal
response to the question  "Well, who determines whether there should be a fee
for the rescue?"  is:  **A committee.**

AFAIK, the CG around here is not assessing a fee for rescues.  However, if they
discover after the fact that the rescued boater was in violation of some of the
safety-related rules, they seem to make sure the boater is cited for those
violations (re:  PFDs on board, etc.).  I have several friends who are
commercial fishers who had to be rescued (mostly from collisions with
freighters), and assessment of their vessel is one of the normal components of
the CG's report.  'Course, when the vessel sinks, it's tougher to do that!

In most cases requiring a tow, the CG points boaters in a non-emergent
situation to a commercial tow.  However, they do tows often, the mouth of the
Columbia River being a high-hazard area.  We get our money's worth from the
local CG.

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:18 PDT