I am a little puzzled by the endless debate over which is more stable in a kayak, sharp or soft chines. To me this is akin to asking whether a race car is faster because it is painted blue or red. It is volume that makes a kayak have stability, not chines. Volume can be displaced arbitrarily according to the designer whims, contributing primary/secondary stability (or lack thereof). Chines, be they round or hard, can indeed affect where the volume is placed, thus affecting stability, but the hardness of the chine has no effect. Okay, since this is Paddlewise, I have to make sure that all possible loopholes in my argument are sealed, or else suffer the consequences, right? :) Loophole #1: All else being equal, if a hard chine boat had its chines rounded off with a grinder sledgehammer or something, then it would have slightly less volume and thus stability would not be the same. But I don't have to be Matt Broze to tell you that a clever designer can get around this issue easily by adding ever so slightly more volume elsewhere. Loophole #2: My arguments are not as solid if the kayak is moving or the water is tilted (e.g. waves). When surfing, hard chines certainly contribute an added element of stability because they resist broaching more than rounded chines. Loophole #3: Some styles of kayaks, be they hard or soft chined, Greenland, British, American, etc, are designed to have certain stability characteristics. This could lead to confusion if one begins to associate the chine design with the stability properties of that particular style. I hope there's not a chink in my armor.... :) Kevin *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed Nov 15 2000 - 19:27:15 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:34 PDT